linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mnt: remove unneeded conversion to bool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2236458d6a4e77bd09afb13bba65747a3416f293.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Fri, 03 Dec 2021 19:06:40 -0800
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        davidcomponentone@...il.com, shuah@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Yang Guang <yang.guang5@....com.cn>,
        Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mnt: remove unneeded conversion to bool

On Fri, 2021-12-03 at 17:24 -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 12/3/21 12:50 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Fri, 2021-12-03 at 11:26 -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> > > On 11/24/21 5:56 PM, davidcomponentone@...il.com wrote:
> > > > From: Yang Guang <yang.guang5@....com.cn>
> > > > 
> > > > The coccinelle report
> > > > ./tools/testing/selftests/mount/unprivileged-remount-test.c:285:54-59:
> > > > WARNING: conversion to bool not needed here
> > > > ./tools/testing/selftests/mount/unprivileged-remount-test.c:207:54-59:
> > > > WARNING: conversion to bool not needed here
> > > > Relational and logical operators evaluate to bool,
> > > > explicit conversion is overly verbose and unneeded.
> > > > 
> > > > Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yang Guang <yang.guang5@....com.cn>
> > > > ---
> > > >    tools/testing/selftests/mount/unprivileged-remount-test.c | 4 ++--
> > > >    1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mount/unprivileged-remount-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mount/unprivileged-remount-test.c
> > > > index 584dc6bc3b06..d2917054fe3a 100644
> > > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mount/unprivileged-remount-test.c
> > > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mount/unprivileged-remount-test.c
> > > > @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ bool test_unpriv_remount(const char *fstype, const char *mount_options,
> > > >    		if (!WIFEXITED(status)) {
> > > >    			die("child did not terminate cleanly\n");
> > > >    		}
> > > > -		return WEXITSTATUS(status) == EXIT_SUCCESS ? true : false;
> > > > +		return WEXITSTATUS(status) == EXIT_SUCCESS;
> > > >    	}
> > > >    
> > > >    	create_and_enter_userns();
> > > > @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ static bool test_priv_mount_unpriv_remount(void)
> > > >    		if (!WIFEXITED(status)) {
> > > >    			die("child did not terminate cleanly\n");
> > > >    		}
> > > > -		return WEXITSTATUS(status) == EXIT_SUCCESS ? true : false;
> > > > +		return WEXITSTATUS(status) == EXIT_SUCCESS;
> > > >    	}
> > > >    
> > > >    	orig_mnt_flags = read_mnt_flags(orig_path);
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > This change doesn't look right. WEXITSTATUS(status) return could be
> > > > 1 or 0 or negative.
> > 
> > The change is at least logically correct.
> > 
> > And isn't WEXITSTATUS range limited from 0->255 ?
> > 
> > https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Exit-Status.html
> > 
> 
> You are right. In any case, I don't see any value in changing the current
> logic. The way it is coded is cryptic enough :)

Well, it'd be more like the rest of the kernel when changed.

bool function()
{
	...
	return <foo> ? true : false;
}

is pretty redundant.