linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v12 13/16] perf record: Extend --threads command line option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YazXOZRSk1EPdZ1n@krava>
Date:   Sun, 5 Dec 2021 16:14:01 +0100
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Alexey Bayduraev <alexey.v.bayduraev@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Alexander Antonov <alexander.antonov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Alexei Budankov <abudankov@...wei.com>,
        Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 13/16] perf record: Extend --threads command line
 option

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 05:08:09PM +0300, Alexey Bayduraev wrote:

SNIP

> +static int record__init_thread_masks_spec(struct record *rec, struct perf_cpu_map *cpus,
> +					  const char **maps_spec, const char **affinity_spec,
> +					  u32 nr_spec)
> +{
> +	u32 s;
> +	int ret = 0, t = 0;
> +	struct mmap_cpu_mask cpus_mask;
> +	struct thread_mask thread_mask, full_mask, *prev_masks;
> +
> +	ret = record__mmap_cpu_mask_alloc(&cpus_mask, cpu__max_cpu());
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out;
> +	record__mmap_cpu_mask_init(&cpus_mask, cpus);
> +	ret = record__thread_mask_alloc(&thread_mask, cpu__max_cpu());
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out_free_cpu_mask;
> +	ret = record__thread_mask_alloc(&full_mask, cpu__max_cpu());
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out_free_thread_mask;
> +	record__thread_mask_clear(&full_mask);

nit, is this clear needed?

jirka

> +
> +	for (s = 0; s < nr_spec; s++) {
> +		record__thread_mask_clear(&thread_mask);
> +
> +		record__mmap_cpu_mask_init_spec(&thread_mask.maps, maps_spec[s]);
> +		record__mmap_cpu_mask_init_spec(&thread_mask.affinity, affinity_spec[s]);
> +
> +		if (!bitmap_and(thread_mask.maps.bits, thread_mask.maps.bits,
> +				cpus_mask.bits, thread_mask.maps.nbits) ||
> +		    !bitmap_and(thread_mask.affinity.bits, thread_mask.affinity.bits,
> +				cpus_mask.bits, thread_mask.affinity.nbits))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		ret = record__thread_mask_intersects(&thread_mask, &full_mask);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto out_free_full_mask;
> +		record__thread_mask_or(&full_mask, &full_mask, &thread_mask);
> +
> +		prev_masks = rec->thread_masks;
> +		rec->thread_masks = realloc(rec->thread_masks,
> +					    (t + 1) * sizeof(struct thread_mask));
> +		if (!rec->thread_masks) {
> +			pr_err("Failed to allocate thread masks\n");
> +			rec->thread_masks = prev_masks;
> +			ret = -ENOMEM;
> +			goto out_free_full_mask;
> +		}
> +		rec->thread_masks[t] = thread_mask;
> +		if (verbose) {
> +			pr_debug("thread_masks[%d]: ", t);
> +			mmap_cpu_mask__scnprintf(&rec->thread_masks[t].maps, "maps");
> +			pr_debug("thread_masks[%d]: ", t);
> +			mmap_cpu_mask__scnprintf(&rec->thread_masks[t].affinity, "affinity");
> +		}
> +		t++;
> +		ret = record__thread_mask_alloc(&thread_mask, cpu__max_cpu());
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto out_free_full_mask;
> +	}
> +
> +	rec->nr_threads = t;
> +	pr_debug("nr_threads: %d\n", rec->nr_threads);
> +
> +	if (rec->nr_threads <= 0)
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +
> +out_free_full_mask:
> +	record__thread_mask_free(&full_mask);
> +out_free_thread_mask:
> +	record__thread_mask_free(&thread_mask);
> +out_free_cpu_mask:
> +	record__mmap_cpu_mask_free(&cpus_mask);
> +out:
> +	return ret;
> +}

SNIP