[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <768fbe83-91e8-abee-02e8-aa5505f48fdb@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 07:23:20 -0800
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: "tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com" <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>
CC: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] selftests/resctrl: Make resctrl_tests run using
kselftest framework
Hi Shaopeng Tan,
On 12/5/2021 10:57 PM, tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com wrote:
> I will separate the part about default limited time to a new patch.
> In order to get some opinions about change default limited time,
> I will add a description in the cover letter,
> when posting the next version of this patch.
When you submit the next version, could you please change the order so
that current patch 3/3 becomes 1/3? If I understand correctly, without
the SIGTERM fix, the test would just hang if run from the kselftest
framework. It would be better to have SIGTERM handled before attempting
to run with the framework to ensure things keep working smoothly.
Thank you very much.
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists