lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211206145612.726135896@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon,  6 Dec 2021 15:55:26 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15 072/207] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix TLB flush range when handling disconnected pt

From: Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>

commit 574c3c55e969096cea770eda3375ff35ccf91702 upstream.

When recursively clearing out disconnected pts, the range based TLB
flush in handle_removed_tdp_mmu_page uses the wrong starting GFN,
resulting in the flush mostly missing the affected range. Fix this by
using base_gfn for the flush.

In response to feedback from David Matlack on the RFC version of this
patch, also move a few definitions into the for loop in the function to
prevent unintended references to them in the future.

Fixes: a066e61f13cf ("KVM: x86/mmu: Factor out handling of removed page tables")
CC: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
Message-Id: <20211115211704.2621644-1-bgardon@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c |   10 ++++------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -316,9 +316,6 @@ static void handle_removed_tdp_mmu_page(
 	struct kvm_mmu_page *sp = sptep_to_sp(rcu_dereference(pt));
 	int level = sp->role.level;
 	gfn_t base_gfn = sp->gfn;
-	u64 old_child_spte;
-	u64 *sptep;
-	gfn_t gfn;
 	int i;
 
 	trace_kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page(sp);
@@ -326,8 +323,9 @@ static void handle_removed_tdp_mmu_page(
 	tdp_mmu_unlink_page(kvm, sp, shared);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < PT64_ENT_PER_PAGE; i++) {
-		sptep = rcu_dereference(pt) + i;
-		gfn = base_gfn + i * KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level);
+		u64 *sptep = rcu_dereference(pt) + i;
+		gfn_t gfn = base_gfn + i * KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level);
+		u64 old_child_spte;
 
 		if (shared) {
 			/*
@@ -373,7 +371,7 @@ static void handle_removed_tdp_mmu_page(
 				    shared);
 	}
 
-	kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address(kvm, gfn,
+	kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address(kvm, base_gfn,
 					   KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level + 1));
 
 	call_rcu(&sp->rcu_head, tdp_mmu_free_sp_rcu_callback);


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ