[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNNFaab-rE2zY_SXCqXsuUAxim8_OLwVT9faY5zQ1qz1_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 07:44:49 +0100
From: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [paulmck-rcu:dev.2021.12.02a 30/43] kernel/kcsan/selftest.c:172:34:
error: implicit declaration of function 'clear_bit_unlock_is_negative_byte'
On Sun, 5 Dec 2021 at 00:09, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
[...]
> kernel/kcsan/selftest.c: In function 'test_barrier':
> >> kernel/kcsan/selftest.c:172:34: error: implicit declaration of function 'clear_bit_unlock_is_negative_byte' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 172 | KCSAN_CHECK_READ_BARRIER(clear_bit_unlock_is_negative_byte(0, &test_var));
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> kernel/kcsan/selftest.c:136:17: note: in definition of macro '__KCSAN_CHECK_BARRIER'
> 136 | barrier; \
> | ^~~~~~~
> kernel/kcsan/selftest.c:172:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KCSAN_CHECK_READ_BARRIER'
> 172 | KCSAN_CHECK_READ_BARRIER(clear_bit_unlock_is_negative_byte(0, &test_var));
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
Fixed by: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211206064151.3337384-2-elver@google.com/
Thanks,
-- Marco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists