[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211206070358.GC42658@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 15:03:58 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jan Harkes <jaharkes@...cmu.edu>, coda@...cmu.edu,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, codalist@...a.cs.cmu.edu,
linux-audit@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/7] pid: Introduce helper task_is_in_root_ns()
Hi Leon,
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 08:49:01AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 10:50:59PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
[...]
> > +static inline bool task_is_in_root_ns(struct task_struct *tsk)
>
> It is bad that this name doesn't reflect PID nature of this namespace.
> Won't it better to name it task_is_in_init_pid_ns()?
Yes, task_is_in_init_pid_ns() is more clear.
Will respin for this. Thank you for suggestion!
Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists