[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <ef242146a87a335ee93b441dcf01665cb847c902.1638817641.git.maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 20:54:32 +0100
From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 26/29] KVM: Optimize gfn lookup in kvm_zap_gfn_range()
From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <maciej.szmigiero@...cle.com>
Introduce a memslots gfn upper bound operation and use it to optimize
kvm_zap_gfn_range().
This way this handler can do a quick lookup for intersecting gfns and won't
have to do a linear scan of the whole memslot set.
Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <maciej.szmigiero@...cle.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 12 +++--
include/linux/kvm_host.h | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index f5a89942f054..7be12f482ab8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -5704,19 +5704,22 @@ static bool __kvm_zap_rmaps(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn_start, gfn_t gfn_end)
{
const struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
struct kvm_memslots *slots;
+ struct kvm_memslot_iter iter;
bool flush = false;
gfn_t start, end;
- int i, bkt;
+ int i;
if (!kvm_memslots_have_rmaps(kvm))
return flush;
for (i = 0; i < KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM; i++) {
slots = __kvm_memslots(kvm, i);
- kvm_for_each_memslot(memslot, bkt, slots) {
+
+ kvm_for_each_memslot_in_gfn_range(&iter, slots, gfn_start, gfn_end) {
+ memslot = iter.slot;
start = max(gfn_start, memslot->base_gfn);
end = min(gfn_end, memslot->base_gfn + memslot->npages);
- if (start >= end)
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(start >= end))
continue;
flush = slot_handle_level_range(kvm, memslot, kvm_zap_rmapp,
@@ -5737,6 +5740,9 @@ void kvm_zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn_start, gfn_t gfn_end)
bool flush;
int i;
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(gfn_end <= gfn_start))
+ return;
+
write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
kvm_inc_notifier_count(kvm, gfn_start, gfn_end);
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index 41efe53cf150..f8ed799e8674 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -848,6 +848,100 @@ struct kvm_memory_slot *id_to_memslot(struct kvm_memslots *slots, int id)
return NULL;
}
+/* Iterator used for walking memslots that overlap a gfn range. */
+struct kvm_memslot_iter {
+ struct kvm_memslots *slots;
+ struct rb_node *node;
+ struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
+};
+
+static inline void kvm_memslot_iter_next(struct kvm_memslot_iter *iter)
+{
+ iter->node = rb_next(iter->node);
+ if (!iter->node)
+ return;
+
+ iter->slot = container_of(iter->node, struct kvm_memory_slot, gfn_node[iter->slots->node_idx]);
+}
+
+static inline void kvm_memslot_iter_start(struct kvm_memslot_iter *iter,
+ struct kvm_memslots *slots,
+ gfn_t start)
+{
+ int idx = slots->node_idx;
+ struct rb_node *tmp;
+ struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
+
+ iter->slots = slots;
+
+ /*
+ * Find the so called "upper bound" of a key - the first node that has
+ * its key strictly greater than the searched one (the start gfn in our case).
+ */
+ iter->node = NULL;
+ for (tmp = slots->gfn_tree.rb_node; tmp; ) {
+ slot = container_of(tmp, struct kvm_memory_slot, gfn_node[idx]);
+ if (start < slot->base_gfn) {
+ iter->node = tmp;
+ tmp = tmp->rb_left;
+ } else {
+ tmp = tmp->rb_right;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Find the slot with the lowest gfn that can possibly intersect with
+ * the range, so we'll ideally have slot start <= range start
+ */
+ if (iter->node) {
+ /*
+ * A NULL previous node means that the very first slot
+ * already has a higher start gfn.
+ * In this case slot start > range start.
+ */
+ tmp = rb_prev(iter->node);
+ if (tmp)
+ iter->node = tmp;
+ } else {
+ /* a NULL node below means no slots */
+ iter->node = rb_last(&slots->gfn_tree);
+ }
+
+ if (iter->node) {
+ iter->slot = container_of(iter->node, struct kvm_memory_slot, gfn_node[idx]);
+
+ /*
+ * It is possible in the slot start < range start case that the
+ * found slot ends before or at range start (slot end <= range start)
+ * and so it does not overlap the requested range.
+ *
+ * In such non-overlapping case the next slot (if it exists) will
+ * already have slot start > range start, otherwise the logic above
+ * would have found it instead of the current slot.
+ */
+ if (iter->slot->base_gfn + iter->slot->npages <= start)
+ kvm_memslot_iter_next(iter);
+ }
+}
+
+static inline bool kvm_memslot_iter_is_valid(struct kvm_memslot_iter *iter, gfn_t end)
+{
+ if (!iter->node)
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * If this slot starts beyond or at the end of the range so does
+ * every next one
+ */
+ return iter->slot->base_gfn < end;
+}
+
+/* Iterate over each memslot at least partially intersecting [start, end) range */
+#define kvm_for_each_memslot_in_gfn_range(iter, slots, start, end) \
+ for (kvm_memslot_iter_start(iter, slots, start); \
+ kvm_memslot_iter_is_valid(iter, end); \
+ kvm_memslot_iter_next(iter))
+
/*
* KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION ioctl allows the following operations:
* - create a new memory slot
Powered by blists - more mailing lists