linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v5 1/5] mfd: da9062: make register CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 6 Dec 2021 20:13:43 +0000
From:   Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>,
        Andrej Picej <andrej.picej@...ik.com>,
        Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>,
        "linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "wim@...ux-watchdog.org" <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
        "linux-imx@....com" <linux-imx@....com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "cniedermaier@...electronics.com" <cniedermaier@...electronics.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 1/5] mfd: da9062: make register CONFIG_I writable

On 06 December 2021 17:12, Guenter Roeck wrote:

> Also, I do not look into one patch of a series and apply tags to other
> patches of that series. Similar reason, only here it is worse because Wim
> may pull a patch from patchwork, from an e-mail, or from my watchdog-next
> branch. We can't have all of them have different tags, so I take what is
> in patchwork and nothing else (and your updated Reviewed-by: tag will
> not apply to other patches of the series because it isn't in patchwork
> for those).

That's fair enough. I'll send tags again for the other in the series. Thanks