lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211206125513.5e835155@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Mon, 6 Dec 2021 12:55:13 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Louis Amas <louis.amas@....link>
Cc:     Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        Matteo Croce <mcroce@...rosoft.com>,
        Emmanuel Deloget <emmanuel.deloget@....link>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net 1/1] net: mvpp2: fix XDP rx queues registering

On Mon,  6 Dec 2021 18:22:19 +0100 Louis Amas wrote:
> The registration of XDP queue information is incorrect because the
> RX queue id we use is invalid. When port->id == 0 it appears to works
> as expected yet it's no longer the case when port->id != 0.
> 
> The problem arised while using a recent kernel version on the
> MACCHIATOBin. This board has several ports:
>  * eth0 and eth1 are 10Gbps interfaces ; both ports has port->id == 0;
>  * eth2 is a 1Gbps interface with port->id != 0.

Still doesn't apply to net/master [1]. Which tree is it based on?
Perhaps you are sending this for the BPF tree? [2] Hm, doesn't apply
there either...

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git/
[2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf.git/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ