linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: initialize return variable on declaration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211206232953.065c0dc9@thinkpad>
Date:   Mon, 6 Dec 2021 23:29:53 +0100
From:   Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Ameer Hamza <amhamza.mgc@...il.com>, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, olteanv@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: initialize return variable on
 declaration

On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 14:21:03 +0100
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 04:32:19PM +0500, Ameer Hamza wrote:
> > Uninitialized err variable defined in mv88e6393x_serdes_power
> > function may cause undefined behaviour if it is called from
> > mv88e6xxx_serdes_power_down context.
> > 
> > Addresses-Coverity: 1494644 ("Uninitialized scalar variable")
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ameer Hamza <amhamza.mgc@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/serdes.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/serdes.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/serdes.c
> > index 55273013bfb5..33727439724a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/serdes.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/serdes.c
> > @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ int mv88e6393x_serdes_power(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port, int lane,
> >  			    bool on)
> >  {
> >  	u8 cmode = chip->ports[port].cmode;
> > -	int err;
> > +	int err = 0;
> >  
> >  	if (port != 0 && port != 9 && port != 10)
> >  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;  
> 
> Hi Marek
> 
> This warning likely comes from cmode not being a SERDES mode, and that
> is not handles in the switch statementing. Do we want an
> 
> default:
> 	err = EINVAL;
> 
> ?
> 
> 	Andrew

Hi Andrew,

currently all the .serdes_power() methods return 0 for non-serdes ports.
This is because the way it is written, these methods are not called if
there is not a serdes lane for a given port.

For this issue with err variable undefined, to fix it we should simply
set int err=0 at the beginning of mv88e6393x_serdes_power(), to make it
behave like other serdes_power() methods do in serdes.c.



But a refactor may be needed for serdes_power() methods, at least
because they are a little weird. But it should be unrelated to this fix.

In serdes.h we have static inline functions
  mv88e6xxx_serdes_power_up(chip, port, lane)
  mv88e6xxx_serdes_power_down(chip, port, lane)

  (These simply call the serdes_power() method of chip ops, with
   additional boolean argument to specify powerup/powerdown.
   Also for these we first need to determine lane for a port. If lane
   does not exists, these should not be called.)

In chip.c we have function
  mv88e6xxx_serdes_power(chip, port, on)
  
  (This finds if the port has a lane, and if so, calls, if on=true
   mv88e6xxx_serdes_power_up()
     from serdes.h, and then
   mv88e6xxx_serdes_irq_request()
     also from serdes.h

   and if on=false, calls _irq_free() & _serdes_power_down()
  )

So if I call
  mv88e6xxx_serdes_power(chip, port, true)
it goes
    mv88e6xxx_serdes_power_up(chip, port, lane)
      chip->info->ops->serdes_power(chip, port, lane, true)
so the `on` argument is used in some places, but in other places there
are two functions instead.

Which I find a little weird.

Marek