linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] misc: Add iop driver for Sunplus SP7021

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7e53f347462143669242f9937330fbde@sphcmbx02.sunplus.com.tw>
Date:   Mon, 6 Dec 2021 08:23:41 +0000
From:   Tony Huang 黃懷厚 <tony.huang@...plus.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:     Tony Huang <tonyhuang.sunplus@...il.com>,
        Derek Kiernan <derek.kiernan@...inx.com>,
        Dragan Cvetic <dragan.cvetic@...inx.com>,
        gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Wells Lu 呂芳騰 <wells.lu@...plus.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] misc: Add iop driver for Sunplus SP7021

Dear Arnd:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 4:04 PM
> To: Tony Huang 黃懷厚 <tony.huang@...plus.com>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>; Tony Huang
> <tonyhuang.sunplus@...il.com>; Derek Kiernan <derek.kiernan@...inx.com>;
> Dragan Cvetic <dragan.cvetic@...inx.com>; gregkh
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>; Linux Kernel Mailing List
> <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>; DTML
> <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>; Wells Lu 呂芳騰 <wells.lu@...plus.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] misc: Add iop driver for Sunplus SP7021
> 
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 4:42 AM Tony Huang 黃懷厚
> <tony.huang@...plus.com> wrote:
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] misc: Add iop driver for Sunplus SP7021
> > > On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 4:48 AM Tony Huang
> <tonyhuang.sunplus@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > +
> > > > +static const struct file_operations sp_iop_fops = {
> > > > +       .owner                  = THIS_MODULE,
> > > > +       .open                   = sp_iop_open,
> > > > +       .read                   = sp_iop_read,
> > > > +       .write                  = sp_iop_write,
> > > > +       .release                = sp_iop_release,
> > > > +};
> > >
> > > This does nothing because all the callbacks are empty. You removed
> > > the inappropriate user space interfaces as I asked you to, but if
> > > there is no way for either kernel or user space to interact with the
> > > hardware, I don't see a point in merging the driver until you add a new
> interface that is usable.
> > >
> >
> > I will modify sp_iop_read() to monitor IOP mailbox data.
> 
> Why is this a useful interface to have? If this is only for debugging, a tracepoint
> may be more useful than a full character device.
> 

Yes, it is for debugging.

> > > Something looks wrong here, maybe reread the documentation for
> > > runtime power management to find a way of putting the device into
> > > low-power mode when it is unused.
> > >
> >
> > When the poweroff command is executed, the run
> > sp_iop_platform_driver_poweroff(void)
> > function will enter the standby mode. The power off will be executed.
> > In the system, IOP can continue to work when other modules in the
> > system enter standby / power down modes to monitor whether the system
> wakes up through RTC.
> 
> Ok, in that case you can probably just remove the empty callback functions.
> 
>          Arnd