[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ya4Ut9ECbYhBkke5@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 15:48:39 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 3/7] gpiolib: of: make fwnode take precedence in
struct gpio_chip
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 02:40:36PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 2:34 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 09:41:33AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 9:10 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > This series concerns the gpio-sim driver and it only uses configfs
> > > (with manually created platform devices) or device-tree. I would
> > > prefer to do ACPI separately and I'd like you to lead that because I
> > > neither have any HW to test nor claim to understand it. :)
> >
> > Please, mention this in the commit message that ACPI is not covered (yet).
>
> But the commit message says: "gpiolib: of: make fwnode take precedence
> in struct gpio_chip" - it says OF right here. :)
It implies that reader should have a 6th sense to know about ACPI and what
else? Please, be explicit over implicit.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists