[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ya4XbbVnK/0Getmt@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 16:00:13 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@...il.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Irina Tirdea <irina.tirdea@...el.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] driver: pmc_atom: free pmc->regmap when
pmc_setup_clks fails
On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 04:44:19PM +0800, Dongliang Mu wrote:
> Smatch reports:
>
> drivers/platform/x86/pmc_atom.c:496
> pmc_setup_dev() warn: 'pmc->regmap' not released on lines: 496.
>
> Fix this by deallocating pm->regmap when pmc_setup_clks fails.
>
> Fixes: 282a4e4ce5f9("platform/x86: Enable Atom PMC platform clocks")
> Signed-off-by: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@...il.com>
> ---
It says v2 in the subject, what is in v2 exactly in comparison to v1?
...
> ret = pmc_setup_clks(pdev, pmc->regmap, data);
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret) {
> + iounmap(pmc->regmap);
> dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "platform clocks register failed: %d\n",
> ret);
In this case it makes sense to move to
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "platform clocks register failed: %d\n", ret);
> + }
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists