[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ya4f1/8N9AQUyY9J@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 16:36:07 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 3/7] gpiolib: of: make fwnode take precedence in
struct gpio_chip
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 03:03:31PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 2:55 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 02:29:59PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > If the driver sets the fwnode in struct gpio_chip, let it take
> > > precedence over the of_node.
> >
> > By the way, have you tried this on pure DT-less/ACPI-less platform
> > (CONFIG_OF=n, CONFIG_ACPI=n)? I believe gpio-sim in that case won't work,
> > because this doesn't affect swnode case, right?
> >
>
> Works just fine on a BeagleBone Black - both the regular GPIO
> controllers as well as DT-instantiated gpio-sim.
Yeah, I realized that myself why.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists