linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kprobes: fix out-of-bounds in register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 6 Dec 2021 09:22:04 +0900
From:   Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:     zhangyue <zhangyue1@...inos.cn>, naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com,
        anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        mhiramat@...nel.org, kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes: fix out-of-bounds in register_kretprobe

Hi Steve,

Can you revert this patch, because as kernel-test bot says that
this does not change anything. (rp::data_size is unsigned.)

At least it should check the result of
"sizeof(struct kretprobe_instance) + rp->data_size". Moreover,
as I sent before as "kprobes: Limit max data_size of the kretprobe instances"
the data_size must be limited to avoid overflow.

Thank you,

On Sun, 5 Dec 2021 12:26:26 +0800
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:

> Hi zhangyue,
> 
> Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
> 
> [auto build test WARNING on rostedt-trace/for-next]
> [also build test WARNING on v5.16-rc3 next-20211203]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/zhangyue/kprobes-fix-out-of-bounds-in-register_kretprobe/20211201-135046
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-trace.git for-next
> config: i386-randconfig-m021-20211203 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20211205/202112051255.NQeIOpp8-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> 
> smatch warnings:
> kernel/kprobes.c:2107 register_kretprobe() warn: always true condition '(rp->data_size >= 0) => (0-u32max >= 0)'
> 
> vim +2107 kernel/kprobes.c
> 
>   2062	
>   2063	int register_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp)
>   2064	{
>   2065		int ret;
>   2066		struct kretprobe_instance *inst = NULL;
>   2067		int i;
>   2068		void *addr;
>   2069	
>   2070		ret = kprobe_on_func_entry(rp->kp.addr, rp->kp.symbol_name, rp->kp.offset);
>   2071		if (ret)
>   2072			return ret;
>   2073	
>   2074		/* If only 'rp->kp.addr' is specified, check reregistering kprobes */
>   2075		if (rp->kp.addr && warn_kprobe_rereg(&rp->kp))
>   2076			return -EINVAL;
>   2077	
>   2078		if (kretprobe_blacklist_size) {
>   2079			addr = kprobe_addr(&rp->kp);
>   2080			if (IS_ERR(addr))
>   2081				return PTR_ERR(addr);
>   2082	
>   2083			for (i = 0; kretprobe_blacklist[i].name != NULL; i++) {
>   2084				if (kretprobe_blacklist[i].addr == addr)
>   2085					return -EINVAL;
>   2086			}
>   2087		}
>   2088	
>   2089		rp->kp.pre_handler = pre_handler_kretprobe;
>   2090		rp->kp.post_handler = NULL;
>   2091	
>   2092		/* Pre-allocate memory for max kretprobe instances */
>   2093		if (rp->maxactive <= 0) {
>   2094	#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPTION
>   2095			rp->maxactive = max_t(unsigned int, 10, 2*num_possible_cpus());
>   2096	#else
>   2097			rp->maxactive = num_possible_cpus();
>   2098	#endif
>   2099		}
>   2100		rp->freelist.head = NULL;
>   2101		rp->rph = kzalloc(sizeof(struct kretprobe_holder), GFP_KERNEL);
>   2102		if (!rp->rph)
>   2103			return -ENOMEM;
>   2104	
>   2105		rp->rph->rp = rp;
>   2106		for (i = 0; i < rp->maxactive; i++) {
> > 2107			if (rp->data_size >= 0)
>   2108				inst = kzalloc(sizeof(struct kretprobe_instance) +
>   2109				       rp->data_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>   2110			if (inst == NULL) {
>   2111				refcount_set(&rp->rph->ref, i);
>   2112				free_rp_inst(rp);
>   2113				return -ENOMEM;
>   2114			}
>   2115			inst->rph = rp->rph;
>   2116			freelist_add(&inst->freelist, &rp->freelist);
>   2117		}
>   2118		refcount_set(&rp->rph->ref, i);
>   2119	
>   2120		rp->nmissed = 0;
>   2121		/* Establish function entry probe point */
>   2122		ret = register_kprobe(&rp->kp);
>   2123		if (ret != 0)
>   2124			free_rp_inst(rp);
>   2125		return ret;
>   2126	}
>   2127	EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(register_kretprobe);
>   2128	
> 
> ---
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>