linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] bpftool: add support of pin prog by name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADxym3ZS7u12-hjbH2n9zw+FwLwbqx0YmE+SG+OAcJ0osVhMxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Dec 2021 09:55:46 +0800
From:   Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
To:     Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc:     Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        john fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>,
        Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>, liujian56@...wei.com,
        Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@...com>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpftool: add support of pin prog by name

On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 5:22 AM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 8:51 PM <menglong8.dong@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>
> >
> > For now, the command 'bpftool prog loadall' use section name as the
> > name of the pin file. However, once there are prog with the same
> > section name in ELF file, this command will failed with the error
> > 'File Exist'.
> >
> > So, add the support of pin prog by function name with the 'pinbyname'
> > argument.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>
> > ---
>
> Doesn't [0] do that already?
>
>   [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20211021214814.1236114-2-sdf@google.com/
>

Ops....Sorry, I didn't notice that patch :/

> >  tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 7 +++++++
> >  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c   | 5 +++++
> >  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h   | 2 ++
> >  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> > index e47e8b06cc3d..74e0aaebfefc 100644
> > --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> > +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> > @@ -1471,6 +1471,7 @@ static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
> >         unsigned int old_map_fds = 0;
> >         const char *pinmaps = NULL;
> >         struct bpf_object *obj;
> > +       bool pinbyname = false;
> >         struct bpf_map *map;
> >         const char *pinfile;
> >         unsigned int i, j;
> > @@ -1589,6 +1590,9 @@ static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
> >                                 goto err_free_reuse_maps;
> >
> >                         pinmaps = GET_ARG();
> > +               } else if (is_prefix(*argv, "pinbyname")) {
> > +                       pinbyname = true;
> > +                       NEXT_ARG();
> >                 } else {
> >                         p_err("expected no more arguments, 'type', 'map' or 'dev', got: '%s'?",
> >                               *argv);
> > @@ -1616,6 +1620,9 @@ static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
> >                                 goto err_close_obj;
> >                 }
> >
> > +               if (pinbyname)
> > +                       bpf_program__set_pinname(pos,
> > +                                                (char *)bpf_program__name(pos));
> >                 bpf_program__set_ifindex(pos, ifindex);
> >                 bpf_program__set_type(pos, prog_type);
> >                 bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(pos, expected_attach_type);
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > index f6faa33c80fa..e8fc1d0fe16e 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > @@ -8119,6 +8119,11 @@ void bpf_program__set_ifindex(struct bpf_program *prog, __u32 ifindex)
> >         prog->prog_ifindex = ifindex;
> >  }
> >
> > +void bpf_program__set_pinname(struct bpf_program *prog, char *name)
> > +{
> > +       prog->pin_name = name;
>
> BPF maps have bpf_map__set_pin_path(), setting a full path is more
> flexible approach, I think, so if we had to do something here, it's
> better to add bpf_program__set_ping_path().

Yeah, I think it's a good idea. I'll do something about it.

Thanks!
Menglong Dong

>
>
> > +}
> > +
> >  const char *bpf_program__name(const struct bpf_program *prog)
> >  {
> >         return prog->name;
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> > index 4ec69f224342..107cf736c2bb 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> > @@ -216,6 +216,8 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__set_priv(struct bpf_program *prog, void *priv,
> >  LIBBPF_API void *bpf_program__priv(const struct bpf_program *prog);
> >  LIBBPF_API void bpf_program__set_ifindex(struct bpf_program *prog,
> >                                          __u32 ifindex);
> > +LIBBPF_API void bpf_program__set_pinname(struct bpf_program *prog,
> > +                                        char *name);
> >
> >  LIBBPF_API const char *bpf_program__name(const struct bpf_program *prog);
> >  LIBBPF_API const char *bpf_program__section_name(const struct bpf_program *prog);
> > --
> > 2.30.2
> >