[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211206182456.4494c5f6@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 18:24:56 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Cc: <davem@...emloft.net>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/6] net: lan966x: add support for interrupts
from analyzer
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 11:46:42 +0100 Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> This patch adds support for handling the interrupts generated by the
> analyzer. Currently, only the MAC table generates these interrupts.
> The MAC table will generate an interrupt whenever it learns or forgets
> an entry in the table. It is the SW responsibility figure out which
> entries were added/removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
> +static struct lan966x_mac_entry *lan966x_mac_alloc_entry(struct lan966x *lan966x,
> + const unsigned char *mac,
> + u16 vid, u16 port_index)
> +{
> + struct lan966x_mac_entry *mac_entry;
> +
> + mac_entry = devm_kzalloc(lan966x->dev,
> + sizeof(*mac_entry), GFP_ATOMIC);
Is it really necessary to use devm_ allocation for the mac entries?
It's 2x memory overhead.
Also why GFP_ATOMIC? Memory allocations are _a lot_ less likely with
GFP_KERNEL.
> + if (!mac_entry)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + memcpy(mac_entry->mac, mac, ETH_ALEN);
> + mac_entry->vid = vid;
> + mac_entry->port_index = port_index;
> + mac_entry->row = LAN966X_MAC_INVALID_ROW;
> + return mac_entry;
> +}
> +static void lan966x_mac_process_raw_entry(struct lan966x_mac_raw_entry *raw_entry,
> + u8 *mac, u16 *vid, u32 *dest_idx)
> +{
> + mac[0] = (raw_entry->mach >> 8) & 0xff;
> + mac[1] = (raw_entry->mach >> 0) & 0xff;
> + mac[2] = (raw_entry->macl >> 24) & 0xff;
> + mac[3] = (raw_entry->macl >> 16) & 0xff;
> + mac[4] = (raw_entry->macl >> 8) & 0xff;
> + mac[5] = (raw_entry->macl >> 0) & 0xff;
> +
> + *vid = (raw_entry->mach >> 16) & 0xfff;
> + *dest_idx = ANA_MACACCESS_DEST_IDX_GET(raw_entry->maca);
Double space before =
> +}
> +
> +static void lan966x_mac_irq_process(struct lan966x *lan966x, u32 row,
> + struct lan966x_mac_raw_entry *raw_entries)
> +{
> + struct lan966x_mac_entry *mac_entry, *tmp;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + char mac[ETH_ALEN];
> + u32 dest_idx;
> + u32 column;
> + u16 vid;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&lan966x->mac_lock, flags);
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(mac_entry, tmp, &lan966x->mac_entries, list) {
> + bool founded = false;
s/founded/found/
> + if (mac_entry->row != row)
> + continue;
> +
> + for (column = 0; column < LAN966X_MAC_COLUMNS; ++column) {
> + /* All the valid entries are at the start of the row,
> + * so when get one invalid entry it can just skip the
> + * rest of the columns
> + */
> + if (!ANA_MACACCESS_VALID_GET(raw_entries[column].maca))
> + break;
> +
> + lan966x_mac_process_raw_entry(&raw_entries[column],
> + mac, &vid, &dest_idx);
> + WARN_ON(dest_idx > lan966x->num_phys_ports);
> +
> + /* If the entry in SW is found, then there is nothing
> + * to do
> + */
> + if (mac_entry->vid == vid &&
> + ether_addr_equal(mac_entry->mac, mac) &&
You need to add __aligned(2) to mac, ether_addr_equal() needs aligned
arguments.
> + mac_entry->port_index == dest_idx) {
> + raw_entries[column].process = true;
> + founded = true;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists