linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation: kunit: remove claims that kunit is a mocking framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFd5g44mWXs-cunWEtVUWgsA3rJe8P19-409SMQNjrYGW0E4iw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Dec 2021 15:05:25 -0500
From:   Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
To:     Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Cc:     davidgow@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        skhan@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: kunit: remove claims that kunit is a
 mocking framework

On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 11:36 AM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> KUnit does not have any first party support for "mocking".
>
> The original RFC had some, but the code got dropped.
> However, the documentation patches never got updated. This fixes that.
>
> https://kunit.dev/mocking.html has a current writeup on the status quo
> and will hopefully be eventually folded into the in-kernel
> Documentation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>

Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>