linux-kernel - [for-next][PATCH 04/13] samples/trace_event: Add __rel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211207214429.659157012@goodmis.org>
Date:   Tue, 07 Dec 2021 16:44:10 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Beau Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Subject: [for-next][PATCH 04/13] samples/trace_event: Add __rel_loc using sample event

From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>

Add '__rel_loc' using sample event for testing.
User can use this for testing purpose. There is
no reason to use this macro from the kernel.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/163757343050.510314.2876529802471645178.stgit@devnote2

Cc: Beau Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
 samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.c |  3 ++
 samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.h | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+)

diff --git a/samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.c b/samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.c
index 1a72b7d95cdc..4d34dc0b0fee 100644
--- a/samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.c
+++ b/samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ static const char *random_strings[] = {
 
 static void simple_thread_func(int cnt)
 {
+	unsigned long bitmask[1] = {0xdeadbeefUL};
 	int array[6];
 	int len = cnt % 5;
 	int i;
@@ -43,6 +44,8 @@ static void simple_thread_func(int cnt)
 	trace_foo_with_template_cond("prints other times", cnt);
 
 	trace_foo_with_template_print("I have to be different", cnt);
+
+	trace_foo_rel_loc("Hello __rel_loc", cnt, bitmask);
 }
 
 static int simple_thread(void *arg)
diff --git a/samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.h b/samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.h
index e61471ab7d14..5ab74fc9a2df 100644
--- a/samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.h
+++ b/samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.h
@@ -506,6 +506,39 @@ DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT(foo_template, foo_with_template_print,
 	TP_ARGS(foo, bar),
 	TP_printk("bar %s %d", __get_str(foo), __entry->bar));
 
+/*
+ * There are yet another __rel_loc dynamic data attribute. If you
+ * use __rel_dynamic_array() and __rel_string() etc. macros, you
+ * can use this attribute. There is no difference from the viewpoint
+ * of functionality with/without 'rel' but the encoding is a bit
+ * different. This is expected to be used with user-space event,
+ * there is no reason that the kernel event use this, but only for
+ * testing.
+ */
+
+TRACE_EVENT(foo_rel_loc,
+
+	TP_PROTO(const char *foo, int bar, unsigned long *mask),
+
+	TP_ARGS(foo, bar, mask),
+
+	TP_STRUCT__entry(
+		__rel_string(	foo,	foo	)
+		__field(	int,	bar	)
+		__rel_bitmask(	bitmask,
+			BITS_PER_BYTE * sizeof(unsigned long)	)
+	),
+
+	TP_fast_assign(
+		__assign_rel_str(foo, foo);
+		__entry->bar = bar;
+		__assign_rel_bitmask(bitmask, mask,
+			BITS_PER_BYTE * sizeof(unsigned long));
+	),
+
+	TP_printk("foo_rel_loc %s, %d, %s", __get_rel_str(foo), __entry->bar,
+		  __get_rel_bitmask(bitmask))
+);
 #endif
 
 /***** NOTICE! The #if protection ends here. *****/
-- 
2.33.0