linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2] Documentation: dev-tools: Add KTAP specification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Dec 2021 14:02:42 -0800
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc:     Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>, Tim.Bird@...y.com,
        shuah@...nel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        rmr167@...il.com, guillaume.tucker@...labora.com,
        dlatypov@...gle.com, kernelci@...ups.io,
        kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] Documentation: dev-tools: Add KTAP specification

On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 11:02:51AM -0800, David Gow wrote:
> From: Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>
> 
> It does not make any significant additions or changes other than those
> already in use in the kernel: additional features can be added as they
> become necessary and used.
> 
> [1]: https://testanything.org/tap-version-13-specification.html
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>
> Co-developed-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>

I like it! Thank you so much for suffering through my earlier reviews.
:)

The only concern I have is wonder what'll be needed to kselftest to
deal with indentation changes. As long as this can be implemented
without a subtest knowing it is a subtest, we're good.

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>

-- 
Kees Cook