[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJuCfpG-CU4AywZGDfMRiEtxMWkL4KMJ-xD1eM15C_z5eYdCJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 15:08:19 -0800
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...nel.org, mhocko@...e.com,
rientjes@...gle.com, hannes@...xchg.org, guro@...com,
riel@...riel.com, minchan@...nel.org, kirill@...temov.name,
aarcange@...hat.com, christian@...uner.io, hch@...radead.org,
oleg@...hat.com, david@...hat.com, jannh@...gle.com,
shakeelb@...gle.com, luto@...nel.org, christian.brauner@...ntu.com,
fweimer@...hat.com, jengelh@...i.de, timmurray@...gle.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mm: protect free_pgtables with mmap_lock write
lock in exit_mmap
On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 2:47 PM Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 2:07 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 01:50:30PM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > - Added a comment for vm_operations_struct::close, documenting restriction for
> > > taking mmap_lock in the callback, per Michal Hocko and Matthew Wilcox
> >
> > This should be a separate patch because it stands alone, but ...
>
> I thought about it and since it was relevant to the change in
> remove_vma locking, I thought it would fit here. However, if you
> insist on splitting it, I'll post it as a separate patch. Please let
> me know.
>
> >
> > > struct vm_operations_struct {
> > > void (*open)(struct vm_area_struct * area);
> > > + /*
> > > + * Called with mmap_lock lock held for write from __split_vma and
> > > + * remove_vma, therefore should never take that lock.
> > > + */
> >
> > Your whitespace indentation is weird. And it'd be nice to make this a
> > kernel-doc comment (I know none of the others are, but that should be
> > fixed too). And naming the functions that call it is wrong too.
> >
> > /**
> > * @close: Called when the VMA is being removed from the MM.
> > * Context: Caller holds mmap_lock.
BTW, is the caller always required to hold mmap_lock for write or it
*might* hold it?
> > */
>
> Ack. Will change and include in the next respin once I hear from you
> on the preference for a separate patch.
> Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists