linux-kernel - RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cifs tree with the fscache tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Dec 2021 08:28:34 +0000
From:   Shyam Prasad <Shyam.Prasad@...rosoft.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
CC:     Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>,
        CIFS <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Steven French <Steven.French@...rosoft.com>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cifs tree with the
 fscache tree


-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> 
Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 3:27 AM
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>; CIFS <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>; Shyam Prasad <Shyam.Prasad@...rosoft.com>; Steven French <Steven.French@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cifs tree with the fscache tree

Hi all,

On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 09:41:39 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the cifs tree got conflicts in:
> 
>   fs/cifs/connect.c
>   fs/cifs/fscache.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   935b45107a80 ("cifs: Support fscache indexing rewrite (untested)")
> 
> from the fscache tree and commits:
> 
>   9d0245fc6a2e ("cifs: wait for tcon resource_id before getting fscache super")
>   c148f8eb032f ("cifs: add server conn_id to fscache client cookie")
>   b1f962ba272b ("cifs: avoid use of dstaddr as key for fscache client 
> cookie")
> 
> from the cifs tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I just used the former versions) and can carry the fix 
> as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but 
> any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream 
> maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want 
> to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to 
> minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

These are now conflict between the fscache tree and Linus' tree.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
================================

Hi David,

As we discussed offline, I will test out the fscache rewrite integration in cifs.ko later this week and submit the final patch to linux-cifs mailing list.
As a part of this, I will fix all the conflicts that arise.
Is this okay with you?
I hope this will eliminate the conflicts between the two trees for now?

Regards,
Shyam