[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dc7d43b96cd1a40654bb2da009ea515b8ded40c3.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2021 11:49:18 +0100
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@...pl>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>,
Ayala Beker <ayala.beker@...el.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iwlwifi: fix LED dependencies
On Tue, 2021-12-07 at 11:16 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-12-07 at 11:14 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Sat, 2021-12-04 at 18:38 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > >
> > > config IWLWIFI_LEDS
> > > bool
> > > - depends on LEDS_CLASS=y || LEDS_CLASS=IWLWIFI
> > > + depends on LEDS_CLASS=y || LEDS_CLASS=MAC80211
> > >
> >
> > Hm. Can we really not have this if LEDS_CLASS=n?
> >
>
> Well, umm. That wouldn't make sense for IWLWIFI_LEDS, sorry.
>
> Might be simpler to express this as "depends on MAC80211_LEDS" which has
> the same condition, and it feels like that makes more sense than
> referencing MAC80211 here?
>
Hm, maybe not. Sorry for the monologue here - but MAC80211_LEDS is user
selectable, and so I guess that's a different thing.
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists