[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <03a5094c-0c53-98ab-97cb-4b27ed1b7a38@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 16:34:16 +0530
From: Sameer Pujar <spujar@...dia.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>, tiwai@...e.com,
broonie@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
thierry.reding@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz
Cc: jonathanh@...dia.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: sound: tegra: Update HDA resets
On 12/7/2021 3:44 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 07.12.2021 09:32, Sameer Pujar пишет:
>> Tegra194 HDA has only two resets unlike the previous generations of
>> Tegra SoCs. Hence update the reset list accordingly.
>>
>> Fixes: 2d8f8955fe02 ("dt-bindings: tegra: Convert HDA doc to json-schema")
> The original txt binding was already wrong, this "fixes" tag is wrong.
The text didn't document "nvidia,tegra194-hda" compatibile support until
the json-schema conversion happened. Perhaps the text doc was not
updated when Tegra194 support was added. So wouldn't this be right to
use json-schema commit as a base for this?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists