[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ya9E4HDK/LskTV+z@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 12:26:24 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
keescook@...omium.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: switch to atomic_t for request references
On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 10:53:49PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > +#define req_ref_zero_or_close_to_overflow(req) \
> > + ((unsigned int) atomic_read(&(req->ref)) + 127u <= 127u)
> > +
> > +static inline bool req_ref_inc_not_zero(struct request *req)
> > +{
> > + return atomic_inc_not_zero(&req->ref);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline bool req_ref_put_and_test(struct request *req)
> > +{
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(req_ref_zero_or_close_to_overflow(req));
> > + return atomic_dec_and_test(&req->ref);
> > +}
So it's just about these two ops, right?
Now, afaict refcount_inc_not_zero() doesn't actually generate terrible
code here's the fast-path of kernel/events/core.c:ring_buffer_get()
refcount_inc_not_zero():
a9d0: 41 54 push %r12
a9d2: 49 89 fc mov %rdi,%r12
a9d5: e8 00 00 00 00 call a9da <ring_buffer_get+0xa> a9d6: R_X86_64_PLT32 __rcu_read_lock-0x4
a9da: 4d 8b a4 24 c8 02 00 00 mov 0x2c8(%r12),%r12
a9e2: 4d 85 e4 test %r12,%r12
a9e5: 74 24 je aa0b <ring_buffer_get+0x3b>
a9e7: 41 8b 14 24 mov (%r12),%edx
a9eb: 85 d2 test %edx,%edx
a9ed: 74 1c je aa0b <ring_buffer_get+0x3b>
a9ef: 8d 4a 01 lea 0x1(%rdx),%ecx
* a9f2: 89 d0 mov %edx,%eax
a9f4: f0 41 0f b1 0c 24 lock cmpxchg %ecx,(%r12)
a9fa: 75 32 jne aa2e <ring_buffer_get+0x5e>
* a9fc: 09 ca or %ecx,%edx
* a9fe: 78 19 js aa19 <ring_buffer_get+0x49>
aa00: e8 00 00 00 00 call aa05 <ring_buffer_get+0x35> aa01: R_X86_64_PLT32 __rcu_read_unlock-0x4
aa05: 4c 89 e0 mov %r12,%rax
aa08: 41 5c pop %r12
aa0a: c3 ret
The * marked instructions are the difference, vs atomic_inc_not_zero():
a9d0: 41 54 push %r12
a9d2: 49 89 fc mov %rdi,%r12
a9d5: e8 00 00 00 00 call a9da <ring_buffer_get+0xa> a9d6: R_X86_64_PLT32 __rcu_read_lock-0x4
a9da: 4d 8b a4 24 c8 02 00 00 mov 0x2c8(%r12),%r12
a9e2: 4d 85 e4 test %r12,%r12
a9e5: 74 1e je aa05 <ring_buffer_get+0x35>
a9e7: 41 8b 04 24 mov (%r12),%eax
a9eb: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
a9ed: 74 16 je aa05 <ring_buffer_get+0x35>
a9ef: 8d 50 01 lea 0x1(%rax),%edx
a9f2: f0 41 0f b1 14 24 lock cmpxchg %edx,(%r12)
a9f8: 75 f1 jne a9eb <ring_buffer_get+0x1b>
a9fa: e8 00 00 00 00 call a9ff <ring_buffer_get+0x2f> a9fb: R_X86_64_PLT32 __rcu_read_unlock-0x4
a9ff: 4c 89 e0 mov %r12,%rax
aa02: 41 5c pop %r12
aa04: c3 ret
Now, ring_buffer_put(), which uses refcount_dec_and_test():
refcount_dec_and_test()
aa40: b8 ff ff ff ff mov $0xffffffff,%eax
aa45: f0 0f c1 07 lock xadd %eax,(%rdi)
aa49: 83 f8 01 cmp $0x1,%eax
aa4c: 74 05 je aa53 <ring_buffer_put+0x13>
aa4e: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
aa50: 7e 1e jle aa70 <ring_buffer_put+0x30>
aa52: c3 ret
atomic_dec_and_test():
aa40: f0 ff 0f lock decl (%rdi)
aa43: 75 1d jne aa62 <ring_buffer_put+0x22>
...
aa62: c3 ret
Has a larger difference, which is fixable with the below patch, leading
to:
a9f0: f0 ff 0f lock decl (%rdi)
a9f3: 74 03 je a9f8 <ring_buffer_put+0x8>
a9f5: 7c 1e jl aa15 <ring_buffer_put+0x25>
a9f7: c3 ret
So where exactly is the performance fail? Is it purely the mess made of
refcount_dec_and_test() ?
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..89e1f84f9170
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef _ASM_X86_REFCOUNT_H
+#define _ASM_X86_REFCOUNT_H
+
+#define refcount_dec_and_test refcount_dec_and_test
+static inline bool refcount_dec_and_test(refcount_t *r)
+{
+ asm_volatile_goto (LOCK_PREFIX "decl %[var]\n\t"
+ "jz %l[cc_zero]\n\t"
+ "jl %l[cc_error]"
+ : : [var] "m" (r->refs.counter)
+ : "memory"
+ : cc_zero, cc_error);
+ return false;
+
+cc_zero:
+ return true;
+
+cc_error:
+ refcount_warn_saturate(r, REFCOUNT_SUB_UAF);
+ return false;
+}
+
+#endif
diff --git a/include/linux/refcount.h b/include/linux/refcount.h
index b8a6e387f8f9..776b035e12a1 100644
--- a/include/linux/refcount.h
+++ b/include/linux/refcount.h
@@ -126,6 +126,8 @@ enum refcount_saturation_type {
void refcount_warn_saturate(refcount_t *r, enum refcount_saturation_type t);
+#include <asm/refcount.h>
+
/**
* refcount_set - set a refcount's value
* @r: the refcount
@@ -328,10 +330,12 @@ static inline __must_check bool __refcount_dec_and_test(refcount_t *r, int *oldp
*
* Return: true if the resulting refcount is 0, false otherwise
*/
+#ifndef refcount_dec_and_test
static inline __must_check bool refcount_dec_and_test(refcount_t *r)
{
return __refcount_dec_and_test(r, NULL);
}
+#endif
static inline void __refcount_dec(refcount_t *r, int *oldp)
{
Powered by blists - more mailing lists