[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPLW+4np+Cynat7yxaayK-DUKLywyvENS0wnXb=LVXD5s9XBTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 14:16:52 +0200
From: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
David Virag <virag.david003@...il.com>,
Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@...sung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Only show unique unit address warning for
enabled nodes
On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 22:19, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 08:35:17PM +0200, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> > There are valid cases when two nodes can have the same address. For
> > example, in Exynos SoCs there is USI IP-core, which might be configured
> > to provide UART, SPI or I2C block, all of which having the same base
> > register address. But only one can be enabled at a time. That looks like
> > this:
> >
> > usi@...200c0 {
> > serial@...20000 {
> > status = "okay";
> > };
> >
> > i2c@...20000 {
> > status = "disabled";
> > };
> > };
> >
> > When running "make dt_binding_check", it reports next warning:
> >
> > Warning (unique_unit_address):
> > /example-0/usi@...200c0/serial@...20000:
> > duplicate unit-address (also used in node
> > /example-0/usi@...200c0/i2c@...20000)
> >
> > Disable "unique_unit_address" in DTC_FLAGS to suppress warnings like
> > that, but enable "unique_unit_address_if_enabled" warning, so that dtc
> > still reports a warning when two enabled nodes are having the same
> > address.
>
> Presumably you have a dts file needing the same thing, so I'll be
> expecting a patch for that too. That's in scripts/Makefile.lib BTW.
>
'-Wno-unique_unit_address' is already in scripts/Makefile.lib, and
when I add '-Wunique_unit_address_if_enabled' there, "make dtbs_check"
reports a lot of warnings (for ARCH=arm64 at least). Among obvious
bugs found, there are some cases like this:
qfprom@...000 {
compatible = "qcom,qfprom";
reg = <0 0x00784000 0 0x8ff>;
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
qusb2p_hstx_trim: hstx-trim-primary@1eb {
reg = <0x1eb 0x1>;
bits = <1 4>;
};
qusb2s_hstx_trim: hstx-trim-secondary@1eb {
reg = <0x1eb 0x2>;
bits = <6 4>;
};
};
where "dtbs_check" doesn't like duplicated "reg = <0x1eb 0x2>;" line.
I'll send the patch soon. Just want you to be on the same page about
side effects from that, because I'm not completely sure it's ok.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
> > Reported-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/Makefile | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/Makefile b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/Makefile
> > index c9abfbe3f0aa..41c555181b6f 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/Makefile
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/Makefile
> > @@ -65,7 +65,9 @@ DT_DOCS = $(patsubst $(srctree)/%,%,$(shell $(find_all_cmd)))
> > override DTC_FLAGS := \
> > -Wno-avoid_unnecessary_addr_size \
> > -Wno-graph_child_address \
> > - -Wno-interrupt_provider
> > + -Wno-interrupt_provider \
> > + -Wno-unique_unit_address \
> > + -Wunique_unit_address_if_enabled
> >
> > # Disable undocumented compatible checks until warning free
> > override DT_CHECKER_FLAGS ?=
> > --
> > 2.30.2
> >
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists