linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] ghes_edac: refactor memory error location processing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9a90c5a4-ec3c-5d82-4a8f-baf94ff65edc@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Dec 2021 20:59:43 +0800
From:   Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>
Cc:     mchehab@...nel.org, bp@...en8.de, tony.luck@...el.com,
        james.morse@....com, ardb@...nel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
        zhangliguang@...ux.alibaba.com, zhuo.song@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ghes_edac: refactor memory error location processing

Hi, Robert,

Thank you for your quick comments! I will change these in the next version.

On 2021/12/7 PM7:30, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 07.12.21 11:19:04, Shuai Xue wrote:
>> The memory error location processing in ghes_edac_report_mem_error() have
>> Duplicated Code with cper_mem_err_location(), cper_dimm_err_location(), and
>> cper_mem_err_type_str() in drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c.
>>
>> To avoid the duplicated code, this patch introduces the above cper_*() into
>> ghes_edac_report_mem_error().
> 
> It is not really duplicate yet, changes are slightly different which
> could trigger problems in some parsers. At least those differences
> should be listed in the patch description. 
I see your concerns. I will document the changes in patch description.

> I would rather remove the
> 'space' delimiter after the colon and take the ghes version of it as
> logs become harder to read. So ideally there is a unification patch
> before the "duplication" is removed with changes in both files as
> necessary for review and to document the change.
I will add a new patch to unify ghes and cper before removing duplication.


>> The EDAC error log is now properly reporting the error as follows (all
>> Validation Bits are enabled):
>>
>> [  375.938411] EDAC MC0: 1 CE single-symbol chipkill ECC on unknown memory (node: 0 card: 0 module: 0 rank: 0 bank: 513 bank_group: 2 bank_address: 1 device: 0 row: 4887 column: 1032 bit_position: 0 requestor_id: 0x0000000000000000 responder_id: 0x0000000000000000 DIMM location: not present. DMI handle: 0x0000 page:0x898b86 offset:0x20 grain:1 syndrome:0x0 - APEI location: node: 0 card: 0 module: 0 rank: 0 bank: 513 bank_group: 2 bank_address: 1 device: 0 row: 4887 column: 1032 bit_position: 0 requestor_id: 0x0000000000000000 responder_id: 0x0000000000000000 DIMM location: not present. DMI handle: 0x0000 status(0x0000000000000000): reserved)
>> [  375.938416] {2}[Hardware Error]: Hardware error from APEI Generic Hardware Error Source: 2
>> [  375.938417] {2}[Hardware Error]: It has been corrected by h/w and requires no further action
>> [  375.938418] {2}[Hardware Error]: event severity: corrected
>> [  375.938419] {2}[Hardware Error]:  Error 0, type: corrected
>> [  375.938420] {2}[Hardware Error]:   section_type: memory error
>> [  375.938421] {2}[Hardware Error]:   error_status: 0x0000000000000000
>> [  375.938422] {2}[Hardware Error]:   physical_address: 0x0000000898b86020
>> [  375.938422] {2}[Hardware Error]:   physical_address_mask: 0x0000000000000000
>> [  375.938426] {2}[Hardware Error]:   node: 0 card: 0 module: 0 rank: 0 bank: 513 bank_group: 2 bank_address: 1 device: 0 row: 4887 column: 1032 bit_position: 0 requestor_id: 0x0000000000000000 responder_id: 0x0000000000000000
>> [  375.938426] {2}[Hardware Error]:   error_type: 4, single-symbol chipkill ECC
>> [  375.938428] {2}[Hardware Error]:   DIMM location: not present. DMI handle: 0x0000
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
> 
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
>> index 6ec8edec6329..08eabb2e23f8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
>> @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ const char *cper_mem_err_type_str(unsigned int etype)
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cper_mem_err_type_str);
>>  
>> -static int cper_mem_err_location(struct cper_mem_err_compact *mem, char *msg)
>> +int cper_mem_err_location(struct cper_mem_err_compact *mem, char *msg)
>>  {
>>  	u32 len, n;
>>  
>> @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static int cper_mem_err_location(struct cper_mem_err_compact *mem, char *msg)
>>  	return n;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static int cper_dimm_err_location(struct cper_mem_err_compact *mem, char *msg)
>> +int cper_dimm_err_location(struct cper_mem_err_compact *mem, char *msg)
>>  {
>>  	u32 len, n;
>>  	const char *bank = NULL, *device = NULL;
> 
> Even though the ghes driver cannot be built as module,
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()s should be added for both.
I will add EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()s.

> It would be good to add a note to the description that the
> UEFI_CPER/EDAC_GHES dependency is always solved through
> ACPI_APEI_GHES/ACPI_APEI. But we should make the UEFI_CPER dependency
> explicit for EDAC_GHES in Kconfig anyway.
Will document the dependency and add UEFI_CPER dependency explicit for
EDAC_GHES in Kconfig in next version.

Cheers,
Shuai