linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/15] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450-qrd: enable ufs nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Ya93Ybq3et5WuGsx@ripper>
Date:   Tue, 7 Dec 2021 07:01:53 -0800
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/15] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450-qrd: enable ufs nodes

On Sun 05 Dec 21:58 PST 2021, Vinod Koul wrote:

> On 01-12-21, 16:18, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > 
> > On 01.12.2021 08:29, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > Enable the UFS and phy node and add the regulators used by them.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-qrd.dts | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-qrd.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-qrd.dts
> > > index 218eb3ce1ee5..3e65d662ab8c 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-qrd.dts
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-qrd.dts
> > > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> > >  
> > >  /dts-v1/;
> > >  
> > > +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> > 
> > This should probably go to the SoC DTSI, as it's generally used
> > 
> > in every DT if you have anything more than serial console working..
> 
> But arent the gpios added in board dts typically? I am okay either
> way... Bjorn where would you like this to be..?
> Seems like we have this is both board as well as SoC DTS

I like Konrad's suggestion of putting it in the dtsi, simply because it
saves us from including it in every board file - where it will be needed.

Regards,
Bjorn

> > 
> > 
> > Konrad
> 
> -- 
> ~Vinod