lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211208172046.gnytm57craxqwilj@revolver>
Date:   Wed, 8 Dec 2021 17:20:57 +0000
From:   Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@...cle.com>
To:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
CC:     "maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org" <maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Michel Lespinasse <walken.cr@...il.com>,
        Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...gle.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
        Rom Lemarchand <romlem@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/66] Maple Tree: Add new data structure

* Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> [211207 10:34]:
> On 12/1/21 15:29, Liam Howlett wrote:
> > From: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
> > 
> > The maple tree is an RCU-safe range based B-tree designed to use modern
> > processor cache efficiently.  There are a number of places in the kernel
> > that a non-overlapping range-based tree would be beneficial, especially
> > one with a simple interface.  The first user that is covered in this
> > patch set is the vm_area_struct, where three data structures are
> > replaced by the maple tree: the augmented rbtree, the vma cache, and the
> > linked list of VMAs in the mm_struct.  The long term goal is to reduce
> > or remove the mmap_sem contention.
> > 
> > The tree has a branching factor of 10 for non-leaf nodes and 16 for leaf
> > nodes.  With the increased branching factor, it is significantly shorter than
> > the rbtree so it has fewer cache misses.  The removal of the linked list
> > between subsequent entries also reduces the cache misses and the need to pull
> > in the previous and next VMA during many tree alterations.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
> 
> For now just some comments, reviewing fully is obviously rather hard, even
> when ignoring the tests...

Thank you for taking the time to look at this.

> 
> > ---
> >  Documentation/core-api/index.rst              |     1 +
> >  Documentation/core-api/maple-tree.rst         |   496 +
> >  MAINTAINERS                                   |    12 +
> >  include/linux/maple_tree.h                    |   559 +
> >  include/trace/events/maple_tree.h             |   123 +
> >  lib/Kconfig.debug                             |     9 +
> >  lib/Makefile                                  |     3 +-
> >  lib/maple_tree.c                              |  6771 +++
> >  lib/test_maple_tree.c                         | 37202 ++++++++++++++++
> >  tools/testing/radix-tree/.gitignore           |     2 +
> >  tools/testing/radix-tree/Makefile             |    13 +-
> >  tools/testing/radix-tree/generated/autoconf.h |     1 +
> >  tools/testing/radix-tree/linux/maple_tree.h   |     7 +
> >  tools/testing/radix-tree/maple.c              |    59 +
> >  .../radix-tree/trace/events/maple_tree.h      |     3 +
> >  15 files changed, 45258 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/core-api/maple-tree.rst
> >  create mode 100644 include/linux/maple_tree.h
> >  create mode 100644 include/trace/events/maple_tree.h
> >  create mode 100644 lib/maple_tree.c
> >  create mode 100644 lib/test_maple_tree.c
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/radix-tree/linux/maple_tree.h
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/radix-tree/maple.c
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/radix-tree/trace/events/maple_tree.h
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/index.rst b/Documentation/core-api/index.rst
> > index 5de2c7a4b1b3..b487373d8585 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/core-api/index.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/core-api/index.rst
> > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ Library functionality that is used throughout the kernel.
> >     this_cpu_ops
> >     timekeeping
> >     errseq
> > +   maple-tree
> >  
> >  Concurrency primitives
> >  ======================
> > diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/maple-tree.rst b/Documentation/core-api/maple-tree.rst
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..70ec7c2801e0
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/core-api/maple-tree.rst
> 
> In general this IMHO this could use some restructuring, right now it feels
> like a mix of various implementation tidbits, while the usage of maple tree
> seems to be just sketched..
> 
> The API functions in lib/maple_tree.c also seem to not have comments in the
> proper doc format that starts with '/**' ?

Okay, I will have a look at what others do and sort this out.

> 
> > @@ -0,0 +1,496 @@
> > +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> > +
> > +
> > +==========
> > +Maple Tree
> > +==========
> > +
> > +:Author: Liam R. Howlett
> > +:Date: May 20, 2021
> > +
> 
> ...

I'll update that header.

> 
> > +Node Slots & Node Pivots
> > +------------------------
> > +
> > +Leaf nodes do not store pointers to nodes, they store user data.
> > +Users may store almost any bit pattern.  As noted above, the optimisation
> > +of storing an entry at 0 in the root pointer cannot be done for data
> > +which have the bottom two bits set to '10'.  We also reserve values
> > +with the bottom two bits set to '10' which are below 4096 (ie 2, 6,
> > +10 .. 4094) for internal use.  Some APIs return errnos as a negative
> > +errno shifted right by two bits and the bottom two bits set to '10',
> > +and while choosing to store these values in the array is not an error,
> > +it may lead to confusion if you're testing for an error with mas_is_err().
> > +
> > +Non-leaf nodes store the type of the node pointed to (enum maple_type
> > +in bits 3-6), bit 2 is reserved.  That leaves bits 0-1 unused for now.
> > +
> > +In regular B-Tree terms, pivots are called keys.  The term pivot is used
> > +to indicate that the tree is specifying ranges,  Pivots may appear in
> > +the subtree with an entry attached to the value whereas keys are unique
> > +to a specific position of a B-tree.  Pivot values are inclusive of the
> > +slot with the same index.
> > +
> > +
> > +The following illustrates a partial layout of a range64 nodes slots and pivots.
> > +
> > +          _________________________________
> 
> This causes "make htmldocs" fail for me
> Documentation/core-api/maple-tree.rst:248: (SEVERE/4) Unexpected section
> title or transition.

I'll test 'make htmldocs' but I think you have made it clear that this
is probably the wrong home for this information anyways.

> 
> > + Slots -> | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
> > +          ┬   ┬   ┬   ┬   ┬   ┬   ┬   ┬   ┬
> > +          │   │   │   │   │   │   │   │   └─ Implied maximum
> > +          │   │   │   │   │   │   │   └─ Pivot 6
> > +          │   │   │   │   │   │   └─ Pivot 5
> > +          │   │   │   │   │   └─ Pivot 4
> > +          │   │   │   │   └─ Pivot 3
> > +          │   │   │   └─ Pivot 2
> > +          │   │   └─ Pivot 1
> > +          │   └─ Pivot 0
> > +          └─  Implied minimum
> > +
> > +Slot contents:
> > + Internal (non-leaf) nodes contain pointers to other nodes.
> > + Leaf nodes contain entries.
> > +
> > +
> > +Node Parent
> > +-----------
> > +
> > +The node->parent of the root node has bit 0 set and the rest of the
> > +pointer is a pointer to the tree itself.  No more bits are available in
> > +this pointer (on m68k, the data structure may only be 2-byte aligned).
> > +
> > +Internal non-root nodes can only have maple_range_* nodes as parents.
> > +The parent pointer is 256B aligned like all other tree nodes.
> > +When storing a 32 or 64 bit values, the offset can fit into 4 bits.
> > +The 16 bit values need an extra bit to store the offset.  This extra bit
> > +comes from a reuse of the last bit in the node type.  This is possible
> > +by using bit 1 to indicate if bit 2 is part of the type or the slot.
> > +
> > +Once the type is decided, the decision of an allocation range type
> > +or a range type is done by examining the immutable tree flag for the
> > +MAPLE_ALLOC_RANGE flag.
> > +
> > + Node types:
> > +  0x??1 = Root
> > +  0x?00 = 16 bit nodes
> > +  0x010 = 32 bit nodes
> > +  0x110 = 64 bit nodes
> > +
> > + Slot size and location in the parent pointer:
> > +  type  : slot location
> > +  0x??1 : Root
> > +  0x?00 : 16 bit values, type in 0-1, slot in 2-6
> > +  0x010 : 32 bit values, type in 0-2, slot in 3-6
> > +  0x110 : 64 bit values, type in 0-2, slot in 3-6
> > +
> > +Node Metadata
> > +-------------
> > +
> > +The node->meta is currently only supported in allocation range 64
> > +(arange_64) node type.  As a result of tracking gaps, there is a small
> > +area that is not used for data storage in this node type.  This area is
> > +reused to store metadata related to the node itself including the data
> > +end and the largest gap location.  This metadata is used to optimize
> > +the gap updating code and in reverse searching for gaps or any other
> > +code that needs to find the end of the data.
> > +
> > +Auxiliary Data
> > +--------------
> > +
> > +At tree creation time, the user can specify that they're willing to
> > +trade off storing fewer entries in a tree in return for storing more
> > +information in each node.
> > +
> > +The maple tree supports recording the largest range of NULL entries
> > +available in this node, also called gaps.  This optimises the tree for
> > +allocating a range.
> > +
> > +
> > +Maple State
> > +-----------
> > +
> > +The maple state is defined in the struct ma_state and is used to keep
> > +track of information during operations, and even between operations when
> > +using the advanced API.
> > +
> > +If state->node has bit 0 set then it references a tree location which
> > +is not a node (eg the root).  If bit 1 is set, the rest of the bits
> > +are a negative errno.  Bit 2 (the 'unallocated slots' bit) is clear.
> > +Bits 3-6 indicate the node type.
> > +
> > +state->alloc either has a request number of nodes or an allocated node.
> > +If stat->alloc has a requested number of nodes, the first bit will be
> > +set (0x1) and the remaining bits are the value.  If state->alloc is
> > +a node, then the node will be of type maple_alloc.  maple_alloc has
> > +MAPLE_NODE_SLOTS - 1 for storing more allocated nodes, a total, and
> > +the node_count in this node.  total is the number of nodes allocated.
> > +node_count is the number of allocated nodes in this node.  The scaling
> > +beyond MAPLE_NODE_SLOTS - 1 is handled by storing further nodes into
> > +state->alloc->slot[0]'s node.  Nodes are taken from state->alloc by
> > +removing a node from the state->alloc node until state->alloc->node_count
> > +is 1, when state->alloc is returned and the state->alloc->slot[0] is
> > +promoted to state->alloc.  Nodes are pushed onto state->alloc by putting
> > +the current state->alloc into the pushed node's slot[0].
> > +
> > +The state also contains the implied min/max of the state->node, the depth
> > +of this search, and the offset. The implied min/max are either from the
> > +parent node or are 0-oo for the root node.  The depth is incremented or
> > +decremented every time a node is walked down or up.  The offset is the
> > +slot/pivot of interest in the node - either for reading or writing.
> > +
> > +When returning a value the maple state index and last respectively contain
> > +the start and end of the range for the entry.  Ranges are inclusive in
> > +the Maple Tree.
> > +
> > +Tree Operations
> > +===============
> > +
> > +Inserting
> > +---------
> > +
> > +Inserting a new range inserts either 0, 1, or 2 pivots within the tree.
> > +If the insert fits exactly into an existing gap with a value of NULL,
> > +then the slot only needs to be written with the new value.  If the range
> > +being inserted is adjacent to another range, then only a single pivot
> > +needs to be inserted (as well as writing the entry).  If the new range
> > +is within a gap but does not touch any other ranges, then two pivots
> > +need to be inserted: the start - 1, and the end.  As usual, the entry
> > +must be written.  Most operations require a new node to be allocated
> > +and replace an existing node to ensure RCU safety, when in RCU mode.
> > +The exception to requiring a newly allocated node is when inserting at
> > +the end of a node (appending).  When done carefully, appending can reuse
> > +the node in place.
> > +
> > +Storing
> > +-------
> > +
> > +Storing is the same operation as insert with the added caveat that it
> > +can overwrite entries.  Although this seems simple enough, one may want
> > +to examine what happens if a single store operation was to overwrite
> > +multiple entries within a self-balancing B-Tree.
> > +
> > +Erasing
> > +-------
> > +
> > +Erasing is the same as a walk to an entry then a store of a NULL to
> > +that entry.  In fact, it is implemented as such using the advanced API.
> > +
> > +Splitting
> > +---------
> > +
> > +Splitting is handled differently from any other B-tree; the Maple Tree
> > +splits up.  Splitting up means that the split operation occurs when the
> 
> "splits up" is confusing - "splits upwards" perhaps?

I agree, thanks.

> 
> > +walk of the tree hits the leaves and not on the way down.  The reason
> > +for splitting up is that it is impossible to know how much space will be
> > +needed until the leaf (or leaves) are reached.  Since overwriting data
> > +is allowed and a range could overwrite more than one range or result in
> > +changing one entry into 3 entries, it is impossible to know if a split
> > +is required until the data is examined.
> > +
> > +Splitting is a balancing act between keeping allocations to a minimum
> > +and avoiding a 'jitter' event where a tree is expanded to make room
> > +for an entry followed by a contraction when the entry is removed.
> > +To accomplish the balance, there are empty slots remaining in both left
> > +and right nodes after a split.
> > +
> > +Another way that 'jitter' is avoided is to terminate a split up early
> > +if the left or right node has space to spare.  This is referred to as
> > +"pushing left" or "pushing right" and is similar to the B* tree, except
> > +the nodes left or right can rarely be reused due to RCU, but the ripple
> > +upwards is halted which is a significant savings.
> > +
> > +To support gap tracking, all NULL entries are kept together and a node
> > +cannot end on a NULL entry, with the exception of the left-most leaf.
> > +The limitation means that the split of a node must be checked for this
> > +condition and be able to put more data in one direction or the other.
> > +
> > +3-way Split
> > +-----------
> > +
> > +Although extremely rare, it is possible to enter what is known as the
> > +3-way split scenario.  The 3-way split comes about by means of a store
> > +of a range that overwrites the end and beginning of two full nodes.
> > +The result is a set of entries that cannot be stored in 2 nodes.
> > +Sometimes, these two nodes can also be located in different parent nodes
> > +which are also full.  This can carry upwards all the way to the root in
> > +the worst case.
> > +
> > +Spanning Store
> > +--------------
> > +
> > +A store operation that spans multiple nodes is called a spanning store and
> > +is handled early in the store call stack by the function mas_is_span_wr().
> > +When a spanning store is identified, the maple state is duplicated.
> > +The first maple state walks the left tree path to ``index``, the duplicate
> > +walks the right tree path to ``last``.  The data in the two nodes are
> > +combined into a single node, two nodes, or possibly three nodes (see the
> > +3-way split above).  A ``NULL`` written to the last entry of a node is
> > +considered a spanning store as a rebalance is required for the operation
> > +to complete and an overflow of data may happen.
> > +
> > +The tree needs to be rebalanced and leaves need to be kept at the same
> > +level.  Rebalancing is done by use of the ``struct maple_topiary``.
> > +The maple_topiary struct keeps track of which nodes to free and which
> > +to destroy (free the subtree).  See mas_spanning_rebalance().
> > +
> > +Each level of the tree is examined and balanced in
> > +mas_spanning_rebalance().  Again, pushing data to the left or right,
> > +or rebalancing against left or right nodes is employed to avoid rippling
> > +up the tree to limit the amount of churn.  Once a new sub-section of the
> > +tree is created, there may be a mix of new and old nodes.  The old nodes
> > +will have the incorrect parent pointers and currently be in two trees: the
> > +original tree and the partially new tree.  To remedy the parent pointers
> > +in the old tree, the new data is swapped into the active tree and a walk
> > +down the tree is performed and the parent pointers are updated.  At each
> > +level there may be up to 3 correct parent pointers which indicates the
> > +new nodes which need to be walked to find any new nodes at a lower level.
> > +See mas_descend_adopt().
> > +
> > +Rebalance
> > +---------
> > +
> > +Rebalancing occurs if a node is insufficient.  Data is rebalanced against
> > +the node to the right if it exists, otherwise the node to the left of
> > +this node is rebalanced against this node.  If rebalancing causes just
> > +one node to be produced instead of two, then the parent is also examined
> > +and rebalanced if it is insufficient.  Every level tries to combine the
> > +data in the same way.  If one node contains the entire range of the tree,
> > +then that node is used as a new root node.
> > +
> > +Bulk Loading
> > +------------
> > +
> > +Sometimes it is necessary to duplicate a tree to a new tree, such as
> > +forking a process and duplicating the VMAs from one tree to a new tree.
> > +When such a situation arises, it is known that the new tree is not
> > +going to be used until the entire tree is populated.  For performance
> > +reasons, it is best to use a bulk load with RCU disabled.  This allows
> > +for optimistic splitting that favours the left and reuse of nodes during
> > +the operation.  Upon completion, the mas_destroy() operation on the maple
> > +state will check the left-most node and rebalance against the node to
> > +the right if necessary.  mas_destroy() will also free any unused nodes.
> > +
> > +
> > +The Maple State
> > +===============
> > +
> > +The ma_state struct keeps track of tree operations to make life easier
> > +for both internal and external tree users.
> > +
> > +Functions and structures
> > +========================
> > +
> > +.. kernel-doc:: include/linux/maple_tree.h
> > +.. kernel-doc:: lib/maple_tree.c
> > +
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index 5250298d2817..e61b3e56e4b5 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -11305,6 +11305,18 @@ L:	linux-man@...r.kernel.org
> >  S:	Maintained
> >  W:	http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages
> >  
> > +MAPLE TREE
> > +M:	Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
> > +L:	linux-mm@...ck.org
> > +S:	Supported
> > +F:	Documentation/core-api/maple_tree.rst
> > +F:	include/linux/maple_tree.h
> > +F:	include/trace/events/maple_tree.h
> > +F:	lib/maple_tree.c
> > +F:	lib/test_maple_tree.c
> > +F:	tools/testing/radix-tree/linux/maple_tree.h
> > +F:	tools/testing/radix-tree/maple.c
> > +
> >  MARDUK (CREATOR CI40) DEVICE TREE SUPPORT
> >  M:	Rahul Bedarkar <rahulbedarkar89@...il.com>
> >  L:	linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
> > diff --git a/include/linux/maple_tree.h b/include/linux/maple_tree.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..a03c7850080a
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/linux/maple_tree.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,559 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */
> > +#ifndef _LINUX_MAPLE_TREE_H
> > +#define _LINUX_MAPLE_TREE_H
> > +/*
> > + * Maple Tree - An RCU-safe adaptive tree for storing ranges
> > + * Copyright (c) 2018 Oracle
> > + * Authors:     Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
> > + *              Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> > +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> > +/* #define CONFIG_MAPLE_RCU_DISABLED */
> > +/* #define CONFIG_DEBUG_MAPLE_TREE_VERBOSE */
> 
> Make this real config or remove?

These should be dropped at this point.  Thanks.

> 
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Allocated nodes are mutable until they have been inserted into the tree,
> > + * at which time they cannot change their type until they have been removed
> > + * from the tree and an RCU grace period has passed.
> > + *
> > + * Removed nodes have their ->parent set to point to themselves.  RCU readers
> > + * check ->parent before relying on the value that they loaded from the
> > + * slots array.  This lets us reuse the slots array for the RCU head.
> > + *
> > + * Nodes in the tree point to their parent unless bit 0 is set.
> > + */
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_64BIT) || defined(BUILD_VDSO32_64)
> > +/* 64bit sizes */
> > +#define MAPLE_NODE_SLOTS	31	/* 256 bytes including ->parent */
> > +#define MAPLE_RANGE64_SLOTS	16	/* 256 bytes */
> > +#define MAPLE_ARANGE64_SLOTS	10	/* 240 bytes */
> > +#define MAPLE_ARANGE64_META_MAX	15	/* Out of range for metadata */
> > +#define MAPLE_ALLOC_SLOTS	(MAPLE_NODE_SLOTS - 1)
> > +#else
> > +/* 32bit sizes */
> > +#define MAPLE_NODE_SLOTS	63	/* 256 bytes including ->parent */
> > +#define MAPLE_RANGE64_SLOTS	32	/* 256 bytes */
> > +#define MAPLE_ARANGE64_SLOTS	21	/* 240 bytes */
> > +#define MAPLE_ARANGE64_META_MAX	22	/* Out of range for metadata */
> > +#define MAPLE_ALLOC_SLOTS	(MAPLE_NODE_SLOTS - 2)
> > +#endif /* defined(CONFIG_64BIT) || defined(BUILD_VDSO32_64) */
> > +
> > +#define MAPLE_NODE_MASK		255UL
> > +
> > +typedef struct maple_enode *maple_enode; /* encoded node */
> > +typedef struct maple_pnode *maple_pnode; /* parent node */
> > +
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * DOC: maple_tree node explained
> > + *
> > + * Each node type has a number of slots for entries and a number of slots for
> > + * pivots.  In the case of dense nodes, the pivots are implied by the position
> > + * and are simply the slot index + the minimum of the node.
> > + *
> > + * In regular B-Tree terms, pivots are called keys.  The term pivot is used to
> > + * indicate that the tree is specifying ranges,  Pivots may appear in the
> > + * subtree with an entry attached to the value where as keys are unique to a
> > + * specific position of a B-tree.  Pivot values are inclusive of the slot with
> > + * the same index.
> > + *
> > + *
> > + * The following illustrates the layout of a range64 nodes slots and pivots.
> > + *
> > + *           _________________________________
> > + *  Slots -> | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
> > + *           ┬   ┬   ┬   ┬   ┬   ┬   ┬   ┬   ┬
> > + *           │   │   │   │   │   │   │   │   └─ Implied maximum
> > + *           │   │   │   │   │   │   │   └─ Pivot 6
> > + *           │   │   │   │   │   │   └─ Pivot 5
> > + *           │   │   │   │   │   └─ Pivot 4
> > + *           │   │   │   │   └─ Pivot 3
> > + *           │   │   │   └─ Pivot 2
> > + *           │   │   └─ Pivot 1
> > + *           │   └─ Pivot 0
> > + *           └─  Implied minimum
> > + *
> > + * Slot contents:
> > + *  Internal (non-leaf) nodes contain pointers to other nodes.
> > + *  Leaf nodes contain entries.
> > + *
> > + *
> > + */
> > +struct maple_metadata {
> > +	unsigned char end;
> > +	unsigned char gap;
> > +
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct maple_range_64 {
> > +	struct maple_pnode *parent;
> > +		unsigned long pivot[MAPLE_RANGE64_SLOTS - 1];
> 
> Inconsistent ident.

ack

> 
> > +	union {
> > +		void __rcu *slot[MAPLE_RANGE64_SLOTS];
> > +		struct {
> > +			void __rcu *pad[MAPLE_RANGE64_SLOTS - 1];
> > +			struct maple_metadata meta;
> > +		};
> > +	};
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct maple_arange_64 {
> > +	struct maple_pnode *parent;
> > +	unsigned long pivot[MAPLE_ARANGE64_SLOTS - 1];
> > +	void __rcu *slot[MAPLE_ARANGE64_SLOTS];
> > +	unsigned long gap[MAPLE_ARANGE64_SLOTS];
> > +	struct maple_metadata meta;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct maple_alloc {
> > +	unsigned long total;
> > +	unsigned char node_count;
> > +	unsigned int request_count;
> > +	struct maple_alloc *slot[MAPLE_ALLOC_SLOTS];
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct maple_topiary {
> > +	struct maple_pnode *parent;
> > +	struct maple_enode *next; /* Overlaps the pivot */
> > +};
> > +
> > +enum maple_type {
> > +	maple_dense,
> > +	maple_leaf_64,
> > +	maple_range_64,
> > +	maple_arange_64,
> > +};
> > +
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * DOC: Maple tree flags
> > + *
> > + * * MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE	- Track gaps in this tree
> > + * * MT_FLAGS_USE_RCU		- Operate in RCU mode
> 
> Inconsistent ident.

I think it's the diff that caused this tabbing change.. however I think
the actual declaration has an issue below this.

> 
> > + * * MT_FLAGS_HEIGHT_OFFSET	- The position of the tree height in the flags
> > + * * MT_FLAGS_HEIGHT_MASK	- The mask for the maple tree height value
> > + * * MT_FLAGS_LOCK_MASK		- How the mt_lock is used
> > + * * MT_FLAGS_LOCK_IRQ		- Acquired irq-safe
> > + * * MT_FLAGS_LOCK_BH		- Acquired bh-safe
> > + * * MT_FLAGS_LOCK_EXTERN	- mt_lock is not used
> > + *
> 
> ...
> 
> > +
> > +void mas_dup_tree(struct ma_state *oldmas, struct ma_state *mas);
> > +void mas_dup_store(struct ma_state *mas, void *entry);
> > +/* This finds an empty area from the highest address to the lowest.
> > + * AKA "Topdown" version,
> > + */
> 
> Bad comment form, also ends with a comma.
> 

ack

> ...
> 
> > +++ b/lib/maple_tree.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,6771 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> > +/*
> > + * Maple Tree implementation
> > + * Copyright (c) 2018 Oracle Corporation
> > + * Authors: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
> > + *	    Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/maple_tree.h>
> > +#include <linux/xarray.h>
> > +#include <linux/types.h>
> > +#include <linux/export.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +#include <linux/limits.h>
> > +#include <asm/barrier.h>
> > +
> > +#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> > +#include <trace/events/maple_tree.h>
> > +
> > +#define MA_ROOT_PARENT 1
> > +
> > +/* Maple state flags */
> > +#define MA_STATE_BULK		1
> > +#define MA_STATE_REBALANCE	2
> > +
> > +#define ma_parent_ptr(x) ((struct maple_pnode *)(x))
> > +#define ma_mnode_ptr(x) ((struct maple_node *)(x))
> > +#define ma_enode_ptr(x) ((struct maple_enode *)(x))
> > +static struct kmem_cache *maple_node_cache;
> > +
> > +static const unsigned long mt_max[] = {
> > +	[maple_dense]		= MAPLE_NODE_SLOTS,
> > +	[maple_leaf_64]		= ULONG_MAX,
> > +	[maple_range_64]	= ULONG_MAX,
> > +	[maple_arange_64]	= ULONG_MAX,
> > +};
> > +#define mt_node_max(x) mt_max[mte_node_type(x)]
> > +
> > +static const unsigned char mt_slots[] = {
> > +	[maple_dense]		= MAPLE_NODE_SLOTS,
> > +	[maple_leaf_64]		= MAPLE_RANGE64_SLOTS,
> > +	[maple_range_64]	= MAPLE_RANGE64_SLOTS,
> > +	[maple_arange_64]	= MAPLE_ARANGE64_SLOTS,
> > +};
> > +#define mt_slot_count(x) mt_slots[mte_node_type(x)]
> > +
> > +static const unsigned char mt_pivots[] = {
> > +	[maple_dense]		= 0,
> > +	[maple_leaf_64]		= MAPLE_RANGE64_SLOTS - 1,
> > +	[maple_range_64]	= MAPLE_RANGE64_SLOTS - 1,
> > +	[maple_arange_64]	= MAPLE_ARANGE64_SLOTS - 1,
> > +};
> > +#define mt_pivot_count(x) mt_pivots[mte_node_type(x)]
> > +
> > +static const unsigned char mt_min_slots[] = {
> > +	[maple_dense]		= MAPLE_NODE_SLOTS / 2,
> > +	[maple_leaf_64]		= (MAPLE_RANGE64_SLOTS / 2) - 2,
> > +	[maple_range_64]	= (MAPLE_RANGE64_SLOTS / 2) - 2,
> > +	[maple_arange_64]	= (MAPLE_ARANGE64_SLOTS / 2) - 1,
> > +};
> > +#define mt_min_slot_count(x) mt_min_slots[mte_node_type(x)]
> > +
> > +#define MAPLE_BIG_NODE_SLOTS	(MAPLE_RANGE64_SLOTS * 2 + 2)
> > +
> > +struct maple_big_node {
> > +	struct maple_pnode *parent;
> > +	struct maple_enode *slot[MAPLE_BIG_NODE_SLOTS];
> > +	unsigned long pivot[MAPLE_BIG_NODE_SLOTS - 1];
> > +	unsigned long gap[MAPLE_BIG_NODE_SLOTS];
> > +	unsigned long min;
> > +	unsigned char b_end;
> > +	enum maple_type type;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct maple_subtree_state {
> > +	struct ma_state *orig_l;	/* Original left side of subtree */
> > +	struct ma_state *orig_r;	/* Original right side of subtree */
> > +	struct ma_state *l;		/* New left side of subtree */
> > +	struct ma_state *m;		/* New middle of subtree (rare) */
> > +	struct ma_state *r;		/* New right side of subtree */
> > +	struct ma_topiary *free;	/* nodes to be freed */
> > +	struct ma_topiary *destroy;	/* Nodes to be destroyed (walked and freed) */
> > +	struct maple_big_node *bn;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* Functions */
> > +static inline struct maple_node *mt_alloc_one(gfp_t gfp)
> > +{
> > +	return kmem_cache_alloc(maple_node_cache, gfp | __GFP_ZERO);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int mt_alloc_bulk(gfp_t gfp, size_t size, void **nodes)
> > +{
> > +	return kmem_cache_alloc_bulk(maple_node_cache, gfp | __GFP_ZERO, size,
> > +				     nodes);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void mt_free_bulk(size_t size, void __rcu **nodes)
> > +{
> > +	kmem_cache_free_bulk(maple_node_cache, size, (void **)nodes);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void mt_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
> > +{
> > +	struct maple_node *node = container_of(head, struct maple_node, rcu);
> > +
> > +	kmem_cache_free(maple_node_cache, node);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * ma_free_rcu() - Use rcu callback to free a maple node
> > + * @node: The node to free
> > + *
> > + * The maple tree uses the parent pointer to indicate this node is no longer in
> > + * use and will be freed.
> > + */
> > +static void ma_free_rcu(struct maple_node *node)
> > +{
> > +	node->parent = ma_parent_ptr(node);
> > +	call_rcu(&node->rcu, mt_free_rcu);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static unsigned int mt_height(const struct maple_tree *mt)
> > +{
> > +	return (mt->ma_flags & MT_FLAGS_HEIGHT_MASK) >> MT_FLAGS_HEIGHT_OFFSET;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void mas_set_height(struct ma_state *mas)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned int new_flags = mas->tree->ma_flags;
> > +
> > +	new_flags &= ~MT_FLAGS_HEIGHT_MASK;
> > +	BUG_ON(mas->depth > MAPLE_HEIGHT_MAX);
> > +	new_flags |= mas->depth << MT_FLAGS_HEIGHT_OFFSET;
> > +	mas->tree->ma_flags = new_flags;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static unsigned int mas_mt_height(struct ma_state *mas)
> > +{
> > +	return mt_height(mas->tree);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline enum maple_type mte_node_type(const struct maple_enode *entry)
> > +{
> > +	return ((unsigned long)entry >> MAPLE_NODE_TYPE_SHIFT) &
> > +		MAPLE_NODE_TYPE_MASK;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline bool ma_is_dense(const enum maple_type type)
> > +{
> > +	return type < maple_leaf_64;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline bool ma_is_leaf(const enum maple_type type)
> > +{
> > +	return type < maple_range_64;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline bool mte_is_leaf(const struct maple_enode *entry)
> > +{
> > +	return ma_is_leaf(mte_node_type(entry));
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * We also reserve values with the bottom two bits set to '10' which are
> > + * below 4096
> > + */
> > +static inline bool mt_is_reserved(const void *entry)
> > +{
> > +	return ((unsigned long)entry < MAPLE_RESERVED_RANGE) &&
> > +		xa_is_internal(entry);
> 
> It's weird to suddenly see xa_ prefix here (and below). AFAICS it's nowhere
> declared that maple tree is derived from xarray so while it's not completely
> surprising given the overlap of authors, wouldn't it be more robust if maple
> tree had its own independent set of these helpers?
> 


Thanks,
Liam

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ