[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7e78e6311cb0d261892f7361a1ef10130436f358.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2021 09:47:26 -0800
From: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: lee.jones@...aro.org, hdegoede@...hat.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com,
mgross@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND V2 3/6] platform/x86/intel: Move intel_pmt from
MFD to Auxiliary Bus
On Wed, 2021-12-08 at 17:22 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 05:50:12PM -0800, David E. Box wrote:
> > +static struct pci_driver intel_vsec_pci_driver = {
> > + .name = "intel_vsec",
> > + .id_table = intel_vsec_pci_ids,
> > + .probe = intel_vsec_pci_probe,
> > +};
>
> So when the PCI device is removed from the system you leak resources and
> have dangling devices?
No.
>
> Why no PCI remove driver callback?
After probe all resources are device managed. There's nothing to explicitly clean up. When the PCI
device is removed, all aux devices are automatically removed. This is the case for the SDSi driver
as well.
David
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists