[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YbD1NsYHbU8FvtTN@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 19:11:02 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: lee.jones@...aro.org, hdegoede@...hat.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com,
mgross@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND V2 3/6] platform/x86/intel: Move intel_pmt from
MFD to Auxiliary Bus
On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 09:47:26AM -0800, David E. Box wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-12-08 at 17:22 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 05:50:12PM -0800, David E. Box wrote:
> > > +static struct pci_driver intel_vsec_pci_driver = {
> > > + .name = "intel_vsec",
> > > + .id_table = intel_vsec_pci_ids,
> > > + .probe = intel_vsec_pci_probe,
> > > +};
> >
> > So when the PCI device is removed from the system you leak resources and
> > have dangling devices?
>
> No.
>
> >
> > Why no PCI remove driver callback?
>
> After probe all resources are device managed. There's nothing to explicitly clean up. When the PCI
> device is removed, all aux devices are automatically removed. This is the case for the SDSi driver
> as well.
Where is the "automatic cleanup" happening? As this pci driver is bound
to the PCI device, when the device is removed, what is called in this
driver to remove the resources allocated in the probe callback?
confused,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists