[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2868725.1638995206@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2021 20:26:46 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Huangzhaoyang <huangzhaoyang@...il.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@...soc.com>,
linux-cachefs@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: judging context via current_is_kswapd instead of gfp_flag
Huangzhaoyang <huangzhaoyang@...il.com> wrote:
[adding linux-cachefs to the cc list]
> Kswapd uses GFP_KERNEL as gfp_flag which make the judgment of
> context is unexpected. fix it by using current_is_kswapd.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@...soc.com>
> ---
> fs/afs/file.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/afs/file.c b/fs/afs/file.c
> index eb11d04..6c199d5 100644
> --- a/fs/afs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/afs/file.c
> @@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ static int afs_releasepage(struct page *page, gfp_t gfp_flags)
> * elected to wait */
> #ifdef CONFIG_AFS_FSCACHE
> if (PageFsCache(page)) {
> - if (!(gfp_flags & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM) || !(gfp_flags & __GFP_FS))
> + if (current_is_kswapd() || !(gfp_flags & __GFP_FS))
> return false;
> wait_on_page_fscache(page);
> }
I have several of these in my fscache-rewrite branch, spread across a number
of filesystems. Should I fix all of them the same way?
fs/9p/vfs_addr.c: if (!gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp) || !(gfp & __GFP_FS))
fs/afs/file.c: if (!gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp) || !(gfp & __GFP_FS))
fs/nfs/file.c: if (!gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp) || !(gfp & __GFP_FS))
fs/nfs/fscache.h: if (!gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp) || !(gfp & __GFP_FS))
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists