[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqL=M299E4jh6FxuE_TSHK4=71Pt4kc=3nbNj5TpRcsZjA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 16:22:43 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"maintainer:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] dt-bindings: pci: Convert iProc PCIe to YAML
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 4:21 PM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 11:32 AM Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 12/8/21 5:44 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Tue, 07 Dec 2021 20:04:32 -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > >> Conver the iProc PCIe controller Device Tree binding to YAML now that
> > >> all DTS in arch/arm and arch/arm64 have been fixed to be compliant.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> > >> ---
> > >> .../bindings/pci/brcm,iproc-pcie.txt | 133 -------------
> > >> .../bindings/pci/brcm,iproc-pcie.yaml | 176 ++++++++++++++++++
> > >> 2 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 133 deletions(-)
> > >> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,iproc-pcie.txt
> > >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,iproc-pcie.yaml
> > >>
> > >
> > > Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
> > > following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
> > > incorrect. These may not be new warnings.
> > >
> > > Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check.
> > > This will change in the future.
> > >
> > > Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1565076
> > >
> > >
> > > pcie@...12000: msi-controller: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm53340-ubnt-unifi-switch8.dt.yaml
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm911360_entphn.dt.yaml
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm911360k.dt.yaml
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958300k.dt.yaml
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958305k.dt.yaml
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958522er.dt.yaml
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958525er.dt.yaml
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958525xmc.dt.yaml
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958622hr.dt.yaml
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958623hr.dt.yaml
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625hr.dt.yaml
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625k.dt.yaml
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625-meraki-mx64-a0.dt.yaml
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625-meraki-mx64.dt.yaml
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625-meraki-mx64w-a0.dt.yaml
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625-meraki-mx64w.dt.yaml
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625-meraki-mx65.dt.yaml
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625-meraki-mx65w.dt.yaml
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm988312hr.dt.yaml
> >
> > Those would mean that the binding patch was applied without the DTS
> > patches earlier in the series?
>
> Right. I generally don't look at dts patches, but I did look at these
> and don't see how this one is fixed (nor caused):
Note that unevaluatedProperties is only enabled in the dtschema main branch.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists