[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1398354F-F251-4CEA-8E92-7C442287F6BC@aspeedtech.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 02:23:16 +0000
From: Billy Tsai <billy_tsai@...eedtech.com>
To: "Winiarska, Iwona" <iwona.winiarska@...el.com>,
"zweiss@...inix.com" <zweiss@...inix.com>
CC: "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"jae.hyun.yoo@...ux.intel.com" <jae.hyun.yoo@...ux.intel.com>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"andrew@...id.au" <andrew@...id.au>,
"jdelvare@...e.com" <jdelvare@...e.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>,
"rdunlap@...radead.org" <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux@...ck-us.net" <linux@...ck-us.net>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org" <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com"
<pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
"andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com"
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/13] dt-bindings: Add bindings for peci-aspeed
Hi Iwona,
On 2021/12/8, 2:30 AM, "Winiarska, Iwona" <iwona.winiarska@...el.com> wrote:
On Thu, 2021-12-02 at 02:31 +0000, Billy Tsai wrote:
> > Hi Zev,
> >
> > On 2021/12/2, 9:55 AM, "Zev Weiss" <zweiss@...inix.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 02:38:04AM PST, Billy Tsai wrote:
> > > >Hi,
> > > >
> > > >On 2021/11/23, 10:10 PM, "openbmc on behalf of Iwona Winiarska"
> > <openbmc-bounces+billy_tsai=aspeedtech.com@...ts.ozlabs.org on behalf of
> > iwona.winiarska@...el.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Add device tree bindings for the peci-aspeed controller driver.
> > > >
> > > > > + aspeed,clock-divider:
> > > > > + description:
> > > > > + This value determines PECI controller internal clock
> > dividing
> > > > > + rate. The divider will be calculated as 2 raised to
> > the power of
> > > > > + the given value.
> > > > > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > > > > + minimum: 0
> > > > > + maximum: 7
> > > > > + default: 0
> > > > > +
> > > > > + aspeed,msg-timing:
> > > > > + description:
> > > > > + Message timing negotiation period. This value will
> > determine the period
> > > > > + of message timing negotiation to be issued by PECI
> > controller. The unit
> > > > > + of the programmed value is four times of PECI clock
> > period.
> > > > > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > > > > + minimum: 0
> > > > > + maximum: 255
> > > > > + default: 1
> > > > > +
> > > > > + aspeed,addr-timing:
> > > > > + description:
> > > > > + Address timing negotiation period. This value will
> > determine the period
> > > > > + of address timing negotiation to be issued by PECI
> > controller. The unit
> > > > > + of the programmed value is four times of PECI clock
> > period.
> > > > > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > > > > + minimum: 0
> > > > > + maximum: 255
> > > > > + default: 1
> > > >I suggest deleting these three properties and replacing them with the
> > following
> > > >
> > > >aspeed,peci-bit-time:
> > > > description:
> > > > The bit time driven by PECI controller. The unit of the
> > value is Hz.
> > > > minimum: 2000
> > > > maximum: 1000000
> > > >
> > > >And the driver should use this property to caculate the appropriate
> > clock-divider,
> > > >msg-timing and addr-timing, instead of exposing hardware registers to
> > dts.
> > > >
> >
> > > Or perhaps just 'bus-frequency' a la i2c-aspeed, gpio-aspeed-sgpio,
> > etc?
> >
> > It's a good ideal for the consistency.
> If we want to go with passing frequency - I would prefer to go with "clock-
> frequency" and use clock framework for exposing it to peci-aspeed (as I
> mentioned in reply to patch 05).
> What do you think?
Good.
It looks that "clock-frequency" is more common usage.
Thanks
Best Regards,
Billy Tsai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists