lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YbAZ/YHMWQZ27NrG@ripper>
Date:   Tue, 7 Dec 2021 18:35:41 -0800
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To:     Katherine Perez <kaperez@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: sm8350: fix tlmm base address

On Tue 07 Dec 18:21 PST 2021, Katherine Perez wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 05:16:14PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On 30-11-21, 21:15, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > On Mon 22 Nov 22:03 CST 2021, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On 22-11-21, 11:05, Katherine Perez wrote:
> > > > > TLMM controller base address is incorrect and will hang on some platforms.
> > > > > Fix by giving the correct address.
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks, recheck the spec this looks correct. We should have tlmm reg
> > > > space here and not tlmm base which also contains xpu region (thus hang)
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Aren't you reading the patch backwards?
> > 
> > I guess :(
> > 
> > > Afaict downstream the driver carries an offset of 0x100000, which we
> > > dropped as we upstreamed the driver. As such changing reg to 0x0f000000
> > > should cause most gpio register accesses to fall outside the actual
> > > register window.
> > > 
> > > Or perhaps I'm missing something here?
> > 
> > I relooked and XPU is at 0xF000000 and Reg at 0xF100000
> > So this patch should be dropped as such. The size mentioned in
> > documentation is also correct
> > 
> > Katherine, can you elaborate more on the hang you have observed? Any
> > specific pins you use which causes this?
> 
> Hi Vinod,
> 
> Yes, it seems to hang in msm_pinctrl_probe. Specifically, line 734 in
> gpiolib.c: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c#n734.
> On i=4, it hangs on assign_bit and the system goes into a reboot loop.
> When I set the TLMM address to f000000, I don't see this issue at all.
> 

The cause for that is quite likely that gc->get_direction() will read
the configuration from gpio<i>'s registers and gpio4 in your system is
reserved for use by some trusted application.

When you change the TLMM address you avoid this problem by just reading
random registers outside the region that contains protected registers.


Adjust the gpio-reserved-ranges in your device's tlmm node to mark gpio4
(probably 4 pins long) as "invalid", gpiolib will then not touch them.

Regards,
Bjorn

> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > ~Vinod

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ