[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <faadff42-e769-cc8b-5ae2-793b2c006b91@omp.ru>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 11:55:59 +0300
From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
"Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
CC: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
<linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<llvm@...ts.linux.dev>,
Ryutaroh Matsumoto <ryutaroh@....e.titech.ac.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Loongson64: Use three arguments for slti
Hello!
On 07.12.2021 20:01, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> LLVM's integrated assembler does not support 'stli <reg>, <imm>':
Perhaps slti (as below)?
> <instantiation>:16:12: error: invalid operand for instruction
> slti $12, (0x6300 | 0x0008)
> ^
> arch/mips/kernel/head.S:86:2: note: while in macro instantiation
> kernel_entry_setup # cpu specific setup
> ^
> <instantiation>:16:12: error: invalid operand for instruction
> slti $12, (0x6300 | 0x0008)
> ^
> arch/mips/kernel/head.S:150:2: note: while in macro instantiation
> smp_slave_setup
> ^
>
> To increase compatibility with LLVM's integrated assembler, use the full
> form of 'stli <reg>, <reg>, <imm>', which matches the rest of
Again, slti?
> arch/mips/. This does not result in any change for GNU as.
>
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1526
> Reported-by: Ryutaroh Matsumoto <ryutaroh@....e.titech.ac.jp>
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
[...]
MBR, Sergey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists