[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211208105113.GE30918@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 11:51:13 +0100
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@...roma2.it>,
Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@...onical.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ahmed Abdelsalam <ahabdels@...il.com>,
Paolo Lungaroni <paolo.lungaroni@...roma2.it>,
Stefano Salsano <stefano.salsano@...roma2.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: fix NULL pointer dereference in ip6_output()
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:
> On 12/7/21 5:21 PM, Andrea Mayer wrote:
> > + IP6CB(skb)->iif = skb->skb_iif;
> > [...]
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
>
> I like that approach over the need for a fall back in core ipv6 code.
What if the device is removed after ->iif assignment and before dev lookup?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists