[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ed8f5ca-e508-e261-e71d-875f5762f2f9@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 12:12:57 +0100
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Cc: alex.williamson@...hat.com, cohuck@...hat.com,
schnelle@...ux.ibm.com, farman@...ux.ibm.com, pmorel@...ux.ibm.com,
hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
frankja@...ux.ibm.com, david@...hat.com, imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com,
vneethv@...ux.ibm.com, oberpar@...ux.ibm.com, freude@...ux.ibm.com,
thuth@...hat.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/32] s390/sclp: detect the zPCI interpretation facility
Am 07.12.21 um 21:57 schrieb Matthew Rosato:
> Detect the zPCI Load/Store Interpretation facility.
>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Farman <farman@...ux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/include/asm/sclp.h | 1 +
> drivers/s390/char/sclp_early.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/sclp.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/sclp.h
> index c68ea35de498..c84e8e0ca344 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/sclp.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/sclp.h
> @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ struct sclp_info {
> unsigned char has_diag318 : 1;
> unsigned char has_sipl : 1;
> unsigned char has_dirq : 1;
> + unsigned char has_zpci_interp : 1;
maybe use zpci_lsi (load store interpretion) as pci interpretion would be something else (also fix the the subject line).
With that
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
> unsigned int ibc;
> unsigned int mtid;
> unsigned int mtid_cp;
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/char/sclp_early.c b/drivers/s390/char/sclp_early.c
> index b64feab62caa..2e8199b7ae50 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/char/sclp_early.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/char/sclp_early.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ static void __init sclp_early_facilities_detect(void)
> sclp.has_gisaf = !!(sccb->fac118 & 0x08);
> sclp.has_hvs = !!(sccb->fac119 & 0x80);
> sclp.has_kss = !!(sccb->fac98 & 0x01);
> + sclp.has_zpci_interp = !!(sccb->fac118 & 0x01);
> if (sccb->fac85 & 0x02)
> S390_lowcore.machine_flags |= MACHINE_FLAG_ESOP;
> if (sccb->fac91 & 0x40)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists