linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v4 7/7] arm64: dts: exynos: Add initial device tree support for Exynos7885 SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 8 Dec 2021 09:55:19 +0900
From:   "Chanho Park" <chanho61.park@...sung.com>
To:     "'David Virag'" <virag.david003@...il.com>,
        "'Sam Protsenko'" <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
Cc:     "'Krzysztof Kozlowski'" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        "'Rob Herring'" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "'Sylwester Nawrocki'" <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
        "'Tomasz Figa'" <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
        "'Chanwoo Choi'" <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        "'Michael Turquette'" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        "'Stephen Boyd'" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 7/7] arm64: dts: exynos: Add initial device tree
 support for Exynos7885 SoC

> > Shouldn't SoC and board files be sent as two separate patches? For
> > example, I've checked exynos5433 and exynos7, SoC support
> 
> For some reason I remembered ExynosAutoV9 sending them together but I
> was wrong, will seperate in the future.

I posted it separately.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-samsung-soc/20211010032246.146939-1-chanho61.park@samsung.com/

Best Regards,
Chanho Park