[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a0ac314f-9e9d-7749-6f22-fd3e44372288@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 14:29:04 +0200
From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Ajay Gupta <ajayg@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/11] i2c: Introduce common module to instantiate CCGx
UCSI
On 12/7/21 21:21, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Introduce a common module to provide an API to instantiate UCSI device
> for Cypress CCGx Type-C controller. Individual bus drivers need to select
> this one on demand.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig | 7 +++++++
> drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile | 3 +++
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ccgx-ucsi.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ccgx-ucsi.h | 11 +++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ccgx-ucsi.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ccgx-ucsi.h
>
I've mixed feelings about this set. I'd either put patches 3-8 first
since e.g. 6/11 and 8/11 are fixing existing issues or even better to
split CCGx UCSI stuff into another set.
Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists