linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE] 5.10.83-rt58

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211208144828.y2e2d4h3yincjyqg@linutronix.de>
Date:   Wed, 8 Dec 2021 15:48:28 +0100
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:     Luis Goncalves <lgoncalv@...hat.com>
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        stable-rt@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
        Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...e.com>,
        Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>,
        Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
        Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>, carnil@...ian.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 5.10.83-rt58

On 2021-12-08 10:14:41 [-0300], Luis Goncalves wrote:
> Yes, I am really sorry that escaped my review. I focused on testing
> the code and missed something that obvious.
> 
> Sorry for the confusion I caused.
> 
> Steven, Sebastian, would it be worth a v5.10.83-rt59 with the patch
> subjects fixed?

No, I don't think that it is worth it. Please correct it for the next
release.
I'm not sure if there is a need for the base version in the patch tag.

> Thanks for spotting that,
> Luis

Sebastian