[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211208154502.GV6385@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 11:45:02 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Marc Zygnier <maz@...nel.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Megha Dey <megha.dey@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Cedric Le Goater <clg@...d.org>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
Stuart Yoder <stuyoder@...il.com>,
Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 21/36] x86/apic/msi: Use device MSI properties
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 11:39:29PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> instead of fiddling with MSI descriptors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/msi.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/msi.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/msi.c
> @@ -160,11 +160,8 @@ static struct irq_chip pci_msi_controlle
> int pci_msi_prepare(struct irq_domain *domain, struct device *dev, int nvec,
> msi_alloc_info_t *arg)
> {
> - struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> - struct msi_desc *desc = first_pci_msi_entry(pdev);
> -
> init_irq_alloc_info(arg, NULL);
> - if (desc->pci.msi_attrib.is_msix) {
> + if (msi_device_has_property(dev, MSI_PROP_PCI_MSIX)) {
> arg->type = X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_PCI_MSIX;
> } else {
> arg->type = X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_PCI_MSI;
>
Just thought for future
It looks like the only use of this is to link to the irq_remapping
which is only using it to get back to the physical device:
case X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_PCI_MSI:
case X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_PCI_MSIX:
set_msi_sid(irte,
pci_real_dma_dev(msi_desc_to_pci_dev(info->desc)));
case X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_PCI_MSI:
case X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_PCI_MSIX:
return get_device_id(msi_desc_to_dev(info->desc));
And this is super confusing:
static inline int get_device_id(struct device *dev)
{
int devid;
if (dev_is_pci(dev))
devid = get_pci_device_id(dev);
else
devid = get_acpihid_device_id(dev, NULL);
return devid;
}
How does an ACPI device have a *PCI* MSI or MSI-X ??
IMHO this makes more sense written as:
struct device *origin_device = msi_desc_get_origin_dev(info->desc);
if (dev_is_pci(origin_device)
devid = get_pci_device_id(origin_device);
else if (dev_is_acpi(origin_device))
devid = get_acpihid_device_id(dev, NULL);
And similar in all places touching X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_PCI_MSI/X
Like this oddball thing in AMD too:
} else if (info->type == X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_PCI_MSI ||
info->type == X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_PCI_MSIX) {
bool align = (info->type == X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_PCI_MSI);
index = alloc_irq_index(devid, nr_irqs, align,
msi_desc_to_pci_dev(info->desc));
} else {
index = alloc_irq_index(devid, nr_irqs, false, NULL);
This should just use a dev and inside alloc_irq_table do the dev_is_pci()
thing to guard the pci_for_each_dma_alias()
Then just call it X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_DEVICE (ie allocated for a struct device)
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists