[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YbDbql39x7Kw6iAC@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 17:22:02 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: lee.jones@...aro.org, hdegoede@...hat.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com,
mgross@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND V2 3/6] platform/x86/intel: Move intel_pmt from
MFD to Auxiliary Bus
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 05:50:12PM -0800, David E. Box wrote:
> +static struct pci_driver intel_vsec_pci_driver = {
> + .name = "intel_vsec",
> + .id_table = intel_vsec_pci_ids,
> + .probe = intel_vsec_pci_probe,
> +};
So when the PCI device is removed from the system you leak resources and
have dangling devices?
Why no PCI remove driver callback?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists