[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211209173141.877-1-6812skiii@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 02:31:41 +0900
From: 6812skiii@...il.com
To: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, dvhart@...radead.org, dave@...olabs.net,
andrealmeid@...labora.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jangwoong Kim <6812skiii@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5] futex: Clarify comment at futex_wait_multiple_setup()
From: Jangwoong Kim <6812skiii@...il.com>
Clarify that multiple futexes might have been woken.
Signed-off-by: Jangwoong Kim <6812skiii@...il.com>
---
kernel/futex/waitwake.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/futex/waitwake.c b/kernel/futex/waitwake.c
index 4ce0923f1ce3..c7a14ebfe61d 100644
--- a/kernel/futex/waitwake.c
+++ b/kernel/futex/waitwake.c
@@ -454,9 +454,9 @@ static int futex_wait_multiple_setup(struct futex_vector *vs, int count, int *wo
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
/*
- * Even if something went wrong, if we find out that a futex
- * was woken, we don't return error and return this index to
- * userspace
+ * Even if something went wrong, if we find out that any futex
+ * was woken, we don't return error and return the index of the
+ * last futex awaken to userspace
*/
*woken = unqueue_multiple(vs, i);
if (*woken >= 0)
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists