linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v16 10/11] of: fdt: Add memory for devices by DT property "linux,usable-memory-range"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+2nt0Kr9jykq-SELk-6E4BAyFCVrRaNRC01Uz5Jqf-Jw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Dec 2021 11:40:32 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
        Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
        Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@...edance.com>,
        Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
        Chen Zhou <dingguo.cz@...group.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 10/11] of: fdt: Add memory for devices by DT property "linux,usable-memory-range"

On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 7:59 PM Leizhen (ThunderTown)
<thunder.leizhen@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2021/12/1 10:55, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
> >>> +   }
> >>>
> >>> -   memblock_cap_memory_range(cap_mem_addr, cap_mem_size);
> >>> +   memblock_cap_memory_range(rgn[0].base, rgn[0].size);
> >>> +   for (i = 1; i < MAX_USABLE_RANGES && rgn[i].size; i++)
> >> s/ &&/,/
>
> Hi Rob:
>   I want to keep "&&" unchanged, do you mind? I'm going to post an
> updated version tomorrow, hopefully the last.

Looks like that was obviously correct, so no objections.

Rob

>
> > Hi Rob:
> >
> > The comma operator may not be suitable for logical judgment. The logical judgment
> > before commas (,) is ignored.
> >
> > Here's my test：
> >
> > C code：
> > int main()
> > {
> >         int i, j;
> >
> >         printf("&&:\n");
> >         for (i = 0, j = 0; i < 2 && j < 3; i++, j++)
> >                 printf("i=%d, j=%d\n", i, j);
> >
> >         printf("\ncomma:\n");
> >         for (i = 0, j = 0; i < 2, j < 3; i++, j++)    //(i < 2） before comma is ignored
> >                 printf("i=%d, j=%d\n", i, j);
> >
> >         return 0;
> > }
> >
> > Output：
> > &&:
> > i=0, j=0
> > i=1, j=1
> >
> > comma:
> > i=0, j=0
> > i=1, j=1
> > i=2, j=2
> >
> >