[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YbJM6H2wOisBY6gU@sol.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 10:37:28 -0800
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>, linux-aio@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ramji Jiyani <ramjiyani@...gle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] aio: fix use-after-free and missing wakeups
On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 10:00:50AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 5:06 PM Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Careful review is appreciated; the aio poll code is very hard to work
> > with, and it doesn't appear to have many tests. I've verified that it
> > passes the libaio test suite, which provides some coverage of poll.
> >
> > Note, it looks like io_uring has the same bugs as aio poll. I haven't
> > tried to fix io_uring.
>
> I'm hoping Jens is looking at the io_ring case, but I'm also assuming
> that I'll just get a pull request for this at some point.
>
> It looks sane to me - my only internal cursing has been about epoll
> and aio in general, not about these patches in particular.
I was hoping that Al would review and apply these, given that he's listed as the
maintainer for this file, and he's worked on this code before. I was also
hoping for review from Christoph, since he added IOCB_CMD_POLL originally. But
yes, if I don't hear anything I'll just send you a pull request. I might
include https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210913111928.98-1-xieyongji@bytedance.com
too, since it's an obviously correct aio fix which has been ignored for months.
- Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists