lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <81fe9f7a-79d5-a77a-089d-99a3b89d78fb@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Dec 2021 19:57:23 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
Cc:     Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] KVM: x86/pmu: Setup pmc->eventsel for fixed PMCs

On 12/9/21 19:53, Jim Mattson wrote:
>> How do we know that i < size? For example, Ice Lake supports 4 fixed
>> counters, but fixed_pmc_events only has three entries.
> 
> We don't, and it's a preexisting bug in intel_pmu_refresh.
> As Like points out, KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID indicates that only three
> fixed counters are supported. So, per the KVM contract, if userspace
> configures four in the guest cpuid info, all bets are off.

Out of bounds accesses are not part of the contract though, even if 
squashed by an unorthodox use of array_index_nospec.  So I'll post my hack.

> I don't like that contract, but changing it means introducing KVM_SET_CPUID3.

And especially it means getting it right, which is the difficult part.

Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ