| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <e2feaf2f6ac4bc82f328f94ca35d14cdc3ca79d1.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2021 14:38:13 -0500
From: James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, zohar@...ux.ibm.com,
serge@...lyn.com, containers@...ts.linux.dev,
dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
krzysztof.struczynski@...wei.com, roberto.sassu@...wei.com,
mpeters@...hat.com, lhinds@...hat.com, lsturman@...hat.com,
puiterwi@...hat.com, jamjoom@...ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paul@...l-moore.com, rgb@...hat.com,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, jmorris@...ei.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 15/16] ima: Move dentries into ima_namespace
On Thu, 2021-12-09 at 10:30 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-12-09 at 15:37 +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 03:34:28PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 05:18:17PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > > > Move the dentries into the ima_namespace for reuse by
> > > > virtualized
> > > > SecurityFS. Implement function freeing the dentries in order of
> > > > files and symlinks before directories.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > This doesn't work as implemented, I think.
> > >
> > > What I would have preferred and what I tried to explain in the
> > > earlier review was:
> > > Keep the dentry stashing global since it is only needed for
> > > init_ima_ns.
> > > Then struct ima_namespace becomes way smaller and simpler.
> > > If you do that then it makes sense to remove the additional
> > > dget() in securityfs_create_dentry() for non-init_ima_ns.
> > > Then you can rely on auto-cleanup in .kill_sb() or on
> > > ima_securityfs_init() failure and you only need to call
> > > ima_fs_ns_free_dentries() if ns != init_ima_ns.
> > >
> > > IIuc, it seems you're currently doing one dput() too many since
> > > you're calling securityfs_remove() in the error path for non-
> > > init_ima_ns which relies on the previous increased dget() which
> > > we removed.
> >
> > If you really want to move the dentry stashing into struct
> > ima_namespace even though it's really unnecessary then you may as
> > well not care about the auto-cleanup and keep that additional
> > ima_fs_ns_free_dentries(ns) call in .kill_sb(). But I really think
> > not dragging dentry stashing into struct ima_namespace is the
> > correct way to go about this.
>
> We, unfortunately, do have one case we can't avoid stashing for the
> policy file. It's this code in ima_release_policy:
>
> > #if !defined(CONFIG_IMA_WRITE_POLICY) &&
> > !defined(CONFIG_IMA_READ_POLICY)
> > securityfs_remove(ns->dentry[IMAFS_DENTRY_IMA_POLICY]);
> > ns->dentry[IMAFS_DENTRY_IMA_POLICY] = NULL;
> >
>
> What it does is that in certain config options, the policy file entry
> gets removed from the securityfs ima directory after you write to it.
This is what I have incremental to v5 that corrects all of this. It
actually keeps every dentry reference (including init_user_ns ones) at
1 so they can be reaped on unmount. For the remove case it does
d_delete and then puts the only reference. This means
securityfs_remove() works for the namespaced policy file as well.
I also got rid of the spurious initialized check in ima_securityfs_init
because it prevents you doing a mount;umount;mount on securityfs within
a namespace.
There's still the problem that if you write the policy, making the file
disappear then unmount and remount securityfs it will come back. My
guess for fixing this is that we only stash the policy file reference,
create it if NULL but then set the pointer to PTR_ERR(-EINVAL) or
something and refuse to create it for that value.
James
---
>From 7de285a81ff06b6e0eb2c6db24810aeef9f6dd17 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 19:33:49 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] fix dentry ref counting
---
security/inode.c | 12 ++----------
security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c | 4 ----
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/inode.c b/security/inode.c
index eaccba7017d9..b53152f7a625 100644
--- a/security/inode.c
+++ b/security/inode.c
@@ -178,8 +178,6 @@ static struct dentry *securityfs_create_dentry(const char *name, umode_t mode,
inode->i_fop = fops;
}
d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
- if (ns == &init_user_ns)
- dget(dentry);
inode_unlock(dir);
return dentry;
@@ -317,21 +315,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(securityfs_create_symlink);
void securityfs_remove(struct dentry *dentry)
{
struct user_namespace *ns = dentry->d_sb->s_user_ns;
- struct inode *dir;
if (!dentry || IS_ERR(dentry))
return;
- dir = d_inode(dentry->d_parent);
- inode_lock(dir);
if (simple_positive(dentry)) {
- if (d_is_dir(dentry))
- simple_rmdir(dir, dentry);
- else
- simple_unlink(dir, dentry);
+ d_delete(dentry);
dput(dentry);
}
- inode_unlock(dir);
+
if (ns == &init_user_ns)
simple_release_fs(&init_securityfs_mount,
&init_securityfs_mount_count);
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
index 778983fd9a73..077a6ff46858 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
@@ -466,10 +466,6 @@ int ima_securityfs_init(struct user_namespace *user_ns, struct dentry *root)
struct ima_namespace *ns = user_ns->ima_ns;
struct dentry *ima_dir;
- /* already initialized? */
- if (ns->dentry[IMAFS_DENTRY_INTEGRITY_DIR])
- return 0;
-
/* FIXME: update when evm and integrity are namespaced */
if (user_ns != &init_user_ns) {
ns->dentry[IMAFS_DENTRY_INTEGRITY_DIR] =
--
2.33.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists