[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YbJgXKf6NkbHgy5A@rocinante>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 21:00:28 +0100
From: Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] PCI: Introduce pci_bus_*() printing macros when
device is not available
Hi Andy and Joe,
[...]
> > > > +#define pci_bus_printk(level, bus, devfn, fmt, arg...) \
> > > > + printk(level "pci %04x:%02x:%02x.%d: " fmt, \
> > > > + pci_domain_nr(bus), bus->number, PCI_SLOT(devfn), PCI_FUNC(devfn), ##arg)
> > >
> > > I have a small preference for using ... and __VA_ARGS___
> >
> > It contradicts what other macros in the pci.h do.
> > So I will stick with current solution for the sake of consistency.
>
> There's always this possibility.
>
> And this: (cheers)
> ---
> include/linux/pci.h | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index 0ce26850470ef..1dc34f6eaeda7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -2456,30 +2456,38 @@ void pci_uevent_ers(struct pci_dev *pdev, enum pci_ers_result err_type);
> /* Provide the legacy pci_dma_* API */
> #include <linux/pci-dma-compat.h>
>
> -#define pci_printk(level, pdev, fmt, arg...) \
> - dev_printk(level, &(pdev)->dev, fmt, ##arg)
> -
> -#define pci_emerg(pdev, fmt, arg...) dev_emerg(&(pdev)->dev, fmt, ##arg)
> -#define pci_alert(pdev, fmt, arg...) dev_alert(&(pdev)->dev, fmt, ##arg)
> -#define pci_crit(pdev, fmt, arg...) dev_crit(&(pdev)->dev, fmt, ##arg)
> -#define pci_err(pdev, fmt, arg...) dev_err(&(pdev)->dev, fmt, ##arg)
> -#define pci_warn(pdev, fmt, arg...) dev_warn(&(pdev)->dev, fmt, ##arg)
> -#define pci_notice(pdev, fmt, arg...) dev_notice(&(pdev)->dev, fmt, ##arg)
> -#define pci_info(pdev, fmt, arg...) dev_info(&(pdev)->dev, fmt, ##arg)
> -#define pci_dbg(pdev, fmt, arg...) dev_dbg(&(pdev)->dev, fmt, ##arg)
> -
> -#define pci_notice_ratelimited(pdev, fmt, arg...) \
> - dev_notice_ratelimited(&(pdev)->dev, fmt, ##arg)
> -
> -#define pci_info_ratelimited(pdev, fmt, arg...) \
> - dev_info_ratelimited(&(pdev)->dev, fmt, ##arg)
> -
> -#define pci_WARN(pdev, condition, fmt, arg...) \
> - WARN(condition, "%s %s: " fmt, \
> - dev_driver_string(&(pdev)->dev), pci_name(pdev), ##arg)
> -
> -#define pci_WARN_ONCE(pdev, condition, fmt, arg...) \
> - WARN_ONCE(condition, "%s %s: " fmt, \
> - dev_driver_string(&(pdev)->dev), pci_name(pdev), ##arg)
> +#define pci_printk(level, pdev, fmt, ...) \
> + dev_printk(level, &(pdev)->dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> +
> +#define pci_emerg(pdev, fmt, ...) \
> + dev_emerg(&(pdev)->dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> +#define pci_alert(pdev, fmt, ...) \
> + dev_alert(&(pdev)->dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> +#define pci_crit(pdev, fmt, ...) \
> + dev_crit(&(pdev)->dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> +#define pci_err(pdev, fmt, ...) \
> + dev_err(&(pdev)->dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> +#define pci_warn(pdev, fmt, ...) \
> + dev_warn(&(pdev)->dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> +#define pci_notice(pdev, fmt, ...) \
> + dev_notice(&(pdev)->dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> +#define pci_info(pdev, fmt, ...) \
> + dev_info(&(pdev)->dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> +#define pci_dbg(pdev, fmt, ...) \
> + dev_dbg(&(pdev)->dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> +
> +#define pci_notice_ratelimited(pdev, fmt, ...) \
> + dev_notice_ratelimited(&(pdev)->dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> +#define pci_info_ratelimited(pdev, fmt, ...) \
> + dev_info_ratelimited(&(pdev)->dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> +
> +#define pci_WARN(pdev, condition, fmt, ...) \
> + WARN(condition, "%s %s: " fmt, \
> + dev_driver_string(&(pdev)->dev), pci_name(pdev), \
> + ##__VA_ARGS__)
> +#define pci_WARN_ONCE(pdev, condition, fmt, ...) \
> + WARN_ONCE(condition, "%s %s: " fmt, \
> + dev_driver_string(&(pdev)->dev), pci_name(pdev), \
> + ##__VA_ARGS__)
>
> #endif /* LINUX_PCI_H */
I think both things look nice!
So perhaps meet in-between here? Two patches in a small series: one adds
new useful macros from Andy, and the other updates current macros as per
Joe's feedback/preference? I am sure Bjorn wouldn't mind (hopefully).
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists