linux-kernel - [PATCH 5/6] selftests: cgroup: Test open-time credential usage for migration checks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211209214707.805617-6-tj@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu,  9 Dec 2021 11:47:06 -1000
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     torvalds@...uxfoundation.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
        mkoutny@...e.com, axboe@...nel.dk, keescook@...omium.org,
        oleg@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        jnewsome@...project.org, legion@...nel.org, luto@...capital.net,
        jannh@...gle.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, security@...nel.org,
        kernel-team@...com, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] selftests: cgroup: Test open-time credential usage for migration checks

When a task is writing to an fd opened by a different task, the perm check
should use the credentials of the latter task. Add a test for it.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_core.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_core.c b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_core.c
index 3df648c37876..01b766506973 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_core.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_core.c
@@ -674,6 +674,73 @@ static int test_cgcore_thread_migration(const char *root)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+/*
+ * cgroup migration permission check should be performed based on the
+ * credentials at the time of open instead of write.
+ */
+static int test_cgcore_lesser_euid_open(const char *root)
+{
+	const uid_t test_euid = 65534;	/* usually nobody, any !root is fine */
+	int ret = KSFT_FAIL;
+	char *cg_test_a = NULL, *cg_test_b = NULL;
+	char *cg_test_a_procs = NULL, *cg_test_b_procs = NULL;
+	int cg_test_b_procs_fd = -1;
+	uid_t saved_uid;
+
+	cg_test_a = cg_name(root, "cg_test_a");
+	cg_test_b = cg_name(root, "cg_test_b");
+
+	if (!cg_test_a || !cg_test_b)
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	cg_test_a_procs = cg_name(cg_test_a, "cgroup.procs");
+	cg_test_b_procs = cg_name(cg_test_b, "cgroup.procs");
+
+	if (!cg_test_a_procs || !cg_test_b_procs)
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	if (cg_create(cg_test_a) || cg_create(cg_test_b))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	if (cg_enter_current(cg_test_a))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	if (chown(cg_test_a_procs, test_euid, -1) ||
+	    chown(cg_test_b_procs, test_euid, -1))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	saved_uid = geteuid();
+	if (seteuid(test_euid))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	cg_test_b_procs_fd = open(cg_test_b_procs, O_RDWR);
+
+	if (seteuid(saved_uid))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	if (cg_test_b_procs_fd < 0)
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	if (write(cg_test_b_procs_fd, "0", 1) >= 0 || errno != EACCES)
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	ret = KSFT_PASS;
+
+cleanup:
+	cg_enter_current(root);
+	if (cg_test_b_procs_fd >= 0)
+		close(cg_test_b_procs_fd);
+	if (cg_test_b)
+		cg_destroy(cg_test_b);
+	if (cg_test_a)
+		cg_destroy(cg_test_a);
+	free(cg_test_b_procs);
+	free(cg_test_a_procs);
+	free(cg_test_b);
+	free(cg_test_a);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 #define T(x) { x, #x }
 struct corecg_test {
 	int (*fn)(const char *root);
@@ -689,6 +756,7 @@ struct corecg_test {
 	T(test_cgcore_proc_migration),
 	T(test_cgcore_thread_migration),
 	T(test_cgcore_destroy),
+	T(test_cgcore_lesser_euid_open),
 };
 #undef T
 
-- 
2.34.1